Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JANUARY 2015

Deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs): Is corporate Australia next?

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

Diminishing resources available to prosecuting authorities may be the impetus for the introduction of DPAs in Australia.

AustraliaCriminal Law

The Federal Government's budget announcements in May this year included notice that funding to the corporate regulator, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), will be reduced by $120 million over the next five years1.The Australian Federal Police (AFP) faces similar losses in funding2. The Federal Government's announcements coincided with the recent introduction of deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) in the United Kingdom.

The Crime and Courts Act 2013 gives UK prosecuting authorities the power to enter into DPAs. Originally used in the United States, a DPA is an agreement between a prosecutor and a company accused of economic offences, such as fraud or foreign bribery, which allows the company to avoid a criminal conviction in return for compliance with certain conditions. DPAs pose a number of apparent benefits for companies and the public sphere in which those companies operate, including the financial benefits of avoiding drawn-out

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from