Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 DECEMBER 2024

Directors' Responsibilities For Sustainability Reporting—ASIC's Views

K&L Gates
K&L Gates
Contributor
K&L Gates

K&L Gates

The Firm K&L Gates is an integrated, international law firm. As a single global law firm, truly...

View firm profile
Explore more from K&L Gates

When directors and officers of reporting entities are assessing how to prepare for complying with the new sustainability reporting obligations, it is tempting to look to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission's (ASIC) approach to enforcement of "greenwashing" as a starting point.

AustraliaCorporate/Commercial Law

Introduction

When directors and officers of reporting entities are assessing how to prepare for complying with the new sustainability reporting obligations, it is tempting to look to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission's (ASIC) approach to enforcement of "greenwashing" as a starting point. However, reporting entities should be aware of the differences in ASIC's enforcement approach between the two.

ASIC'S Enforcement Approach

Greenwashing misconduct refers to misleading and deceptive statements made by entities about their green credentials. ASIC interventions are founded on long-established laws that prohibit misleading and deceptive conduct.

Climate-related financial disclosures by reporting entities are to be made in the same context as their financial statements. As a result, directors will need to ensure that the sustainability report presents a true and fair view of the organisation's position and prospects and that the view is neither

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from