Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JULY 2025

LD Munich, July 22, 2025, Order On Evidence Preservation And Inspection, UPC_CFI_63/2025

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

The court clarified the distinction between a deadline's length and starting point under Rule 198.1 RoP. While the length is prescribed, the court can determine...

GermanyIntellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

Deadline Length vs. Starting Point

The court clarified the distinction between a deadline's length and starting point under Rule 198.1 RoP. While the length is prescribed, the court can determine the starting point, especially considering the expert report's due date (Rule 196.4 RoP).

Discretion to Change Starting Point

The court can adjust the starting point, especially if the expert report is delayed (Rule 198.1 RoP).

2. Division

Local Division Munich

3. UPC number

UPC_CFI_63/2025

4. Type of proceedings

Interim proceedings / Proceedings for evidence preservation and inspection

5. Parties

Applicant: Nanoval GmbH & Co. KG
Respondent: ALD Vacuum Technologies GmbH

6. Patent(s)

EP 3 083 107

7. Jurisdictions

UPC

8. Body of legislation / Rules

Rule 198.1 RoP, Rule 9.4 RoP, Rule 333 RoP, Rule 196.4 RoP, Rule 300(a) RoP, Article 48(6) UPCA
Rule 291 RoP

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from