Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 MARCH 2026

Düsseldorf LD, March 18, 2026, Decision On Infringement Action And Counterclaim For Revocation, UPC_CFI_519/2024, UPC_CFI_64/2025

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

The Court granted destruction of infringing products, but expressly excluded advertising materials. It held that Art.

GermanyIntellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

Advertising materials are not covered by Art. 64(2)(e) UPCA and therefore cannot be ordered destroyed

The Court granted destruction of infringing products, but expressly excluded advertising materials. It held that Art. 64(2)(e) UPCA covers products and the materials and equipment relevant to their production, not mere promotional materials depicting the products. The Court also refused publication of the decision, awarded only the fixed court fee as provisional damages because no substantiated damages calculation had been provided, and rejected the request to make enforcement conditional on security.

2. Division

Düsseldorf Local Division

3. UPC number

UPC_CFI_519/2024

UPC_CFI_64/2025

4. Type of proceedings

Infringement action and counterclaim for revocation

5. Parties

Claimant:

CUP&CINO Kaffeesystem-Vertrieb GmbH & Co. KG.

Defendant:

ALPINA Coffee Systems GmbH.

6. Patent(s)

EP 3 398 487 B1

7. Body of legislation / Rules

Art. 64(2)(e) UPCA

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from