Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

PODCAST · 12 SEPTEMBER 2023

Beneath The Law - Deconstructing The Jordan Peterson Case (Podcast)

Gardiner Roberts LLP
Explore more from Gardiner Roberts LLP

Jordan Peterson's clash with the College of Psychologists of Ontario has been controversial to say the least. In this episode, Stephen and Gavin highlight the profound ability to misunderstand.....

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Gavin Tighe
Gavin Tighe
Stephen Thiele
Stephen Thiele
Author LinkedIn connections

self

Jordan Peterson's clash with the College of Psychologists of Ontario has been controversial to say the least. In this episode, Stephen and Gavin highlight the profound ability to misunderstand argument, position, and opinion for a belief – and the growing divide in society when it comes to viewpoints and tolerance for alternative perspectives.

Where does the balance lie between defending freedom of speech and maintaining professional conduct within the adversarial system?

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Can An Arbitration Agreement Preclude Appeals, Even With Errors Of Law?

An Ontario court ruled that arbitration agreements containing "final and binding" language may prevent parties from appealing legal errors made by arbitrators. The decision examines how a $3 million construction dispute was resolved through arbitration, and why the losing party could not challenge the arbitrator's legal mistakes despite their significant financial impact.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Article

Boeing and Securities Class Certification: Trends in the United States and Canada

A U.S. appeals court has unanimously overturned certification of a securities class action against Boeing, establishing that plaintiffs must demonstrate a workable, class-wide damages methodology at the certification stage. This decision reinforces heightened standards for class certification that parallel evolving requirements in Canadian securities litigation, where courts increasingly demand concrete evidence and specific liability theories before approving class actions.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Article

Lessons In Suing Securities Regulators: Herner v. Mutual Fund Dealers Association And Ontario Securities Commission, 2026 ONSC 4889

A mutual fund dealing representative sued the MFDA and OSC for $47.5 million in damages, alleging intentional torts including conspiracy, abuse of process, and malicious prosecution stemming from a regulatory investigation and enforcement proceedings. The 21-day trial resulted in complete dismissal of all claims, with the court making significant findings on regulatory immunity provisions and the scope of duties owed by securities regulators to regulated persons.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Crawley MacKewn Brush LLP
Crawley MacKewn Brush LLP
Article

Landmark SCC Ruling Provides Clarity On Privative Clauses

The Supreme Court of Canada has delivered a landmark ruling declaring section 66 of the Conflict of Interest Act unconstitutional, fundamentally reshaping the boundaries between legislative authority and judicial oversight of administrative decisions. This unanimous decision addresses longstanding questions about the validity of privative clauses that restrict courts' ability to review findings by Parliament's ethics commissioner.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Torys
Torys
Article

Deal Series - Due Diligence In The Age Of AI: What Every Buyer Should Be Asking

As artificial intelligence becomes deeply embedded in business operations across all industries, buyers and investors face a new category of risks that extend far beyond traditional technology companies. From intellectual property concerns to data sovereignty issues, understanding how AI is integrated into a target company's workflows has become essential for effective due diligence and risk assessment.
CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Article

Expert Reports Generated By Artificial Intelligence Are Prone To Being Ignored (Shirran v. The Owners, Strata Plan KAS 4004; Laake v. 3M Company)

Expert reports are often invaluable in civil and criminal cases. In general, these reports provide the trier of fact with an opinion from an expert witness who possesses specialized knowledge, skill or experience on technical or scientific issues in dispute that are beyond the trier of fact’s knowledge or experience.
United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Article

Recent Decisions Illustrate The Consequences Of Deficient Or Absent Motion Materials

Recent Ontario Superior Court decisions demonstrate how procedural missteps in civil litigation can derail even straightforward motions. From improperly served materials and excessive hearsay to missing factums and deficient affidavits, these cases reveal the tangible consequences when litigants fail to comply with the Rules of Civil Procedure. Courts are increasingly willing to adjourn, dismiss, or deny relief when parties cannot meet basic evidentiary and procedural requirements.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Article

40-Year-Old NOSI Does Not Go To Root Of Title (2225064 Ontario Ltd. v. 55 Bradwick Limited)

Until recently , a Notice of Security Interest (NOSI) could be registered on title to property in Ontario to give notice of a security interest in fixtures attached to land, such as HVAC equipment. The use of NOSIs expanded to include dubious long-term contracts for equipment ranging from water softeners to smart-home thermostats, creating obstacles for homeowners seeking to sell or refinance their properties.
CanadaReal Estate and Construction
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Article

Lawyer Obtains Injunction To Stop Defamatory Online Harassment (Miller v. Ahn)

A lawyer successfully obtained an interim injunction to remove defamatory social media posts after a defendant orchestrated a campaign of online harassment, including review bombing and anti-Semitic attacks. The Ontario court found a strong prima facie case of internet harassment and ordered the removal of offending content, balancing freedom of expression against irreparable harm to the lawyer's professional reputation and family safety.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Article

Family Expectations, Unjust Enrichment, And Beneficial Ownership: Lessons From The Family Farm

In Laberge Gareau v. Laberge Gareau, 2026 ONSC 4669, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice addressed an unfortunate dispute between a mother and her two daughters over ownership of the family farm. The court found that the mother remained the beneficial owner of the property when she registered it in trust for her daughters and that she never intended to give up beneficial ownership.
CanadaReal Estate and Construction
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Article

Counsel’s Threat Of Civil Proceedings Results In Mistrial Of Criminal Conviction Against Frank Stronach (R. V. Stronach No.5)

After a trial in 2026, Frank Stronach was found guilty of two sexual offence charges for incidents that had occurred some 40 years earlier. Following the conviction, but before sentencing, one of the complainants had a civil lawyer write to Mr. Stronach’s criminal lawyer to threaten a civil claim for damages of almost $1 million
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Article

Behemoth B.C. Case Delivers A Blizzard Of Professional Negligence Findings

A British Columbia Supreme Court case examines how a seemingly minor pleading error in a $30 million settlement led to a decade-long legal battle, resulting in findings of professional negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract against the lawyer responsible. The court's analysis explores the boundaries of lawyer liability, client responsibility, and the duty of candor when mistakes occur in high-stakes commercial litigation.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP