Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 SEPTEMBER 2026

Key Considerations For In-House Counsel

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In-house counsel face critical decisions at the outset of internal investigations that determine the credibility and defensibility of the entire process. This guide examines the strategic questions around scope, privilege protection, external support, and documentation that must be addressed early—often under pressure and before the facts are fully known.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The first decisions in an investigation are usually made before anyone knows what happened. In-house counsel makes most of them.

Scope, supervision, information flow, privilege, and external support. These calls get made early, often under pressure, and they shape the credibility of everything that follows.

Part 2 of our Investigations series sets out the questions we work through with in-house counsel: whether to investigate at all, who should supervise, how to protect privilege across jurisdictions, when external support improves the outcome, and what record the organization will rely on if proceedings follow.

The answers are rarely straightforward. Asking the questions early is what makes them defensible.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from