Search
Search
Menu
Menu
Close
Close
Close
Search
Rankings
Jurisdictions
Submissions
Research+
Green Guide
Future Lawyers
Firms & Lawyers
Service Providers
Barristers’ Sets
Networks
Interview with…
In-House
In-House Content
GC Powerlist
Knowledge Centre
Data Products
Legal Business
News & Developments
Special Reports
About us
Legal 500
FAQs
Newsletters
Careers
Contact us
Comparative Guides
Events
Legal 500 TV
About us
Legal 500
FAQs
Newsletters
Careers
Contact us
Deutschland
DE
Paris
FR
home
Rankings
United States
Intellectual property
Patents: litigation (full coverage)
Firms
Lawyers
How are firms ranked?
How are firms ranked?
All firms
Global
National
What does global and national mean?
Client satisfaction
What is client satisfaction?
1
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
More information
Compare
1
Latham & Watkins LLP
Client satisfaction
More information
Compare
1
Paul Hastings LLP
More information
Compare
1
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
More information
Compare
1
WilmerHale
More information
Compare
2
Cooley LLP
More information
Compare
2
DLA Piper LLP (US)
More information
Compare
2
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
More information
Compare
2
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Client satisfaction
More information
Compare
2
Goodwin
More information
Compare
2
Irell & Manella LLP
More information
Compare
2
Jones Day
Client satisfaction
More information
Compare
2
Morrison Foerster
More information
Compare
2
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
More information
Compare
2
Williams & Connolly LLP
More information
Compare
2
Winston & Strawn LLP
More information
Compare
3
Arnold & Porter
Client satisfaction
More information
Compare
3
Baker Botts L.L.P.
More information
Compare
3
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
More information
Compare
3
Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
More information
Compare
3
McDermott Will & Schulte
Client satisfaction
More information
Compare
3
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
More information
Compare
3
Venable LLP
Client satisfaction
More information
Compare
3
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
More information
Compare
3
Groombridge, Wu, Baughman & Stone
Compare
3
McKool Smith
Compare
4
ArentFox Schiff
More information
Compare
4
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
More information
Compare
4
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Client satisfaction
More information
Compare
4
King & Spalding
More information
Compare
4
Mayer Brown
More information
Compare
4
MoloLamken LLP
More information
Compare
4
Norton Rose Fulbright
More information
Compare
4
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
More information
Compare
4
Ropes & Gray LLP
More information
Compare
4
Sidley Austin LLP
More information
Compare
4
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
More information
Compare
4
Duane Morris LLP
Compare
4
Fenwick & West LLP
Compare
4
O'Melveny
Compare
4
Rakoczy Molino Mazzochi Siwik LLP
Compare
4
Reed Smith LLP
Compare
5
Akin
More information
Compare
5
A&O Shearman
More information
Compare
5
BakerHostetler
More information
Compare
5
Dechert
More information
Compare
5
K&L Gates
More information
Compare
5
Kasowitz LLP
More information
Compare
5
Katten
More information
Compare
5
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
More information
Compare
5
Eversheds Sutherland
Compare
5
Susman Godfrey LLP
Compare
Proskauer Rose LLP
Client satisfaction
More information
Compare
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
Compare
Hogan Lovells US LLP
Client satisfaction
More information
Compare
Steptoe LLP
Client satisfaction
More information
Compare
White & Case LLP
More information
Compare
Comparative Guides
View
View
Patent Litigation
United States
Contribution from
A&O Shearman