Search
Search
Menu
Menu
Close
Close
Close
Search
Rankings
Jurisdictions
Submissions
Research+
Green Guide
Future Lawyers
Firms & Lawyers
Service Providers
Barristers’ Sets
Networks
Interview with…
In-House
In-House Content
GC Powerlist
Knowledge Centre
Data Products
Legal Business
News & Developments
Special Reports
About us
Legal 500
FAQs
Marketing
Careers
Contact us
Comparative Guides
Events
Legal 500 TV
About us
Legal 500
FAQs
Marketing
Careers
Contact us
Deutschland
DE
Paris
FR
home
Rankings
United States
Intellectual property
Patents: litigation (full coverage)
Firms
Lawyers
How are firms ranked?
All firms
Global
National
What does global and national mean?
Client satisfaction
What is client satisfaction?
1
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
Firm profile
Compare
1
Latham & Watkins LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
1
Paul Hastings LLP
Firm profile
Compare
1
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Firm profile
Compare
1
WilmerHale
Firm profile
Compare
2
Cooley LLP
Firm profile
Compare
2
DLA Piper LLP (US)
Firm profile
Compare
2
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Firm profile
Compare
2
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
2
Goodwin
Firm profile
Compare
2
Irell & Manella LLP
Firm profile
Compare
2
Jones Day
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
2
Morrison Foerster
Firm profile
Compare
2
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Firm profile
Compare
2
Williams & Connolly LLP
Firm profile
Compare
2
Winston & Strawn LLP
Firm profile
Compare
3
Arnold & Porter
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
3
Baker Botts L.L.P.
Firm profile
Compare
3
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Firm profile
Compare
3
McDermott Will & Schulte
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
3
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Firm profile
Compare
3
Venable LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
3
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Firm profile
Compare
3
Groombridge, Wu, Baughman & Stone
Compare
3
Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
Compare
3
McKool Smith
Compare
4
ArentFox Schiff
Firm profile
Compare
4
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
Firm profile
Compare
4
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
4
King & Spalding
Firm profile
Compare
4
Mayer Brown
Firm profile
Compare
4
MoloLamken LLP
Firm profile
Compare
4
Norton Rose Fulbright
Firm profile
Compare
4
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
Firm profile
Compare
4
Ropes & Gray LLP
Firm profile
Compare
4
Sidley Austin LLP
Firm profile
Compare
4
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
Firm profile
Compare
4
Duane Morris LLP
Compare
4
Fenwick & West LLP
Compare
4
O'Melveny
Compare
4
Rakoczy Molino Mazzochi Siwik LLP
Compare
4
Reed Smith LLP
Compare
5
Akin
Firm profile
Compare
5
A&O Shearman
Firm profile
Compare
5
BakerHostetler
Firm profile
Compare
5
Dechert
Firm profile
Compare
5
K&L Gates
Firm profile
Compare
5
Kasowitz LLP
Firm profile
Compare
5
Katten
Firm profile
Compare
5
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Firm profile
Compare
5
Eversheds Sutherland
Compare
5
Susman Godfrey LLP
Compare
Hogan Lovells US LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
Proskauer Rose LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
Steptoe LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
White & Case LLP
Firm profile
Compare
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
Compare
Comparative Guides
View
View
Patent Litigation
United States
Contribution from
A&O Shearman