Market Overview
By

Introduction

Mexico stands as one of Latin America’s largest and most dynamic economies, offering a strategic geographical location, abundant natural resources, and a skilled workforce. As the 13th largest economy in the world and the 2nd in Latin America, Mexico offers a strategic location with access to both the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans, making it a crucial hub for international trade. With a population of over 130 million and proximity to the United States, Mexico is a key player in global trade and a gateway to the Americas. The country’s extensive network of free trade agreements, including the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (“USMCA”), positions it as a competitive destination for international investment. Furthermore, its diverse economy encompasses strong manufacturing, energy, tourism, and agriculture sectors, making it an attractive landscape for foreign businesses.

Despite its potential, doing business in Mexico requires navigating its unique legal, regulatory, and cultural frameworks. Mexico’s legal framework continually evolves to accommodate its growing economy and international partnerships, making it an attractive destination for foreign investors. This article highlights essential aspects for investors, including corporate structures, investment protections, and the impact of recent legal reforms.

Most Common Companies and Foreign Investments

Mexico’s corporate landscape offers various legal entities for conducting business, the most common being the Sociedad Anónima (S.A.) and the Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada (S. de R.L.). The S.A. is akin to a corporation, while the S. de R.L. resembles a limited liability company. The choice between an S.A. and an S. de R.L. depends on the specific goals and needs of the business. An S.A. might be better suited for larger enterprises seeking to attract significant investment. At the same time, an S. de R.L. could be more appropriate for smaller, closely-held businesses prioritizing operational flexibility and control. Both structures offer the benefit of limited liability, protecting shareholders’ assets from business liabilities.

Mexico has implemented a robust legal framework to promote and protect foreign investments. This framework ensures compliance with international standards while fostering a competitive economic environment. This regime balances investor rights with the state’s authority to regulate its economy.

(i) Investment Protection and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Regime

Investment protection in Mexico is primarily derived from its extensive international treaties, such as the Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs), and free trade frameworks, such as the already mentioned United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). These agreements typically include provisions for non-discrimination, fair and equitable treatment, protection from expropriation without compensation, and access to investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms.

At the domestic level, the Foreign Investment Law (Ley de Inversión Extranjera) ensures that foreign investors enjoy equal treatment as nationals in most sectors, with specific exceptions outlined under the law.

In this regard, even though Mexico welcomes FDI across various sectors, there are certain industries that remain restricted or regulated for national security or strategic interests. Foreign ownership limitations exist in areas such as energy, telecommunications, and aviation. For instance, specific sectors, such as oil exploration or radio broadcasting, have historically been reserved for the state or limited to a capped percentage of foreign ownership.

Mexico’s FDI regime provides that transactions in certain industries and those resulting in foreign capital acquiring over 49% of Mexican entities with high asset value require the authorization of the National Commission of Foreign Investments, which looks into the transactions’s labor, environmental, economic and scientific impact.

Further, Mexico has established mechanisms, including, under the National Registry of Foreign Investments (Registro Nacional de Inversiones Extranjeras, RNIE) to facilitate and track FDI, which oversees compliance and reporting requirements for foreign investors. Additionally, reforms in the energy and infrastructure sectors have attracted significant FDI, opening previously restricted areas to private and foreign participation.

These efforts have contributed to Mexico’s position as a leading recipient of FDI in Latin America.

(ii) Antitrust Regulations

Currently, the Federal Economic Competition Law governs Mexico’s antitrust framework (Ley Federal de Competencia Económica), enforced by the Federal Economic Competition Commission (COFECE) and the Federal Teñecommjnicayions Institute (IFT).

COFECE and the IFT are autonomous authorities that promote free competition and prevents monopolistic practices. The law prohibits abuse of market dominance, cartels, and other anti-competitive behavior. Companies considering mergers or acquisitions that meet certain thresholds must also notify COFECE (or the IFT, if the transaction involves the telecommunications or broadcasting industries) for approval to ensure they do not harm market competition.

In December 2024, Mexico enacted a significant constitutional amendment aimed at streamlining government agencies, which directly impacts the country’s antitrust regulatory framework. This reform involves the dissolution of COFECE and the IFT, with their responsibilities being consolidated into a single economic competition authority under the Ministry of Economy (Secretaría de Economía). This new body will possess its own assets, and operate with technical and operational independence. However, this new period also brings certain level of uncertainty and some transition challenges, since there is also a risk that increased political oversight under the Ministry of Economy might introduce delays or affect transparency. Therefore, it will be important to monitor how effectively this consolidated authority addresses antitrust approval procedures.

The reform mandates the Mexican congress to develop secondary laws on competition, free market access, telecommunications, and broadcasting and to define the structure and powers of the new authority, but fails to set a deadline for this to happen. COFECE and the IFT will disappear 180 after the enacting of the new antitrust statute. During this transitional period, COFECE and IFT will continue their operations until the new framework enters into force.

Investment Opportunities: Main Sectors and Key Investors

Mexico presents vast opportunities for investment across several sectors:

  1. Energy. Despite recent reforms to strengthen state control, private investment in renewable energy and oil and gas remains significant. In particular, Mexico’s solar and wind energy potential has attracted global players seeking to develop sustainable projects.
  2. Manufacturing. As a hub for automotive and aerospace industries, Mexico benefits from nearshoring trends and advanced industrial parks. The USMCA has further boosted the competitiveness of Mexican manufacturing by ensuring stable trade conditions with the United States and Canada.
  3. Technology. The country’s growing digital economy and startup ecosystem attract venture capital and innovation-focused investors. Initiatives such as fintech regulations and support for tech incubators highlight Mexico’s commitment to fostering technological growth.

Key investors in Mexico include the United States, Canada, and Spain, driven by proximity, trade agreements, and historical ties. China has also emerged as a significant player in infrastructure and technology projects.

Trends in Capital: Mexico-Spain Interconnection

The historical, cultural, and economic ties between Mexico and Spain have fostered a robust bilateral relationship, making Spain one of Mexico’s most significant foreign investors. Spain consistently ranks among the top foreign direct investors in Mexico. According to recent data, Spanish companies account for over 12% of total FDI inflows to Mexico, positioning Spain as the second-largest European investor after the Netherlands. This relationship is particularly evident in the energy, telecommunications, and infrastructure sectors, where Spanish companies like Iberdrola, Telefónica, and Acciona have a strong presence. Likewise, Mexican multinationals are expanding into Spain, particularly in the food and beverage, cement, and telecommunications sectors (e.g. Grupo Bimbo, Cemex, and Grupo Carso).

Below are a few examples of the role of Spanish companies in Mexico:

  1. As for the energy sector, Spanish companies have played a significant role in Mexico’s renewable energy sector. Firms like Iberdrola, Acciona, and Naturgy have been instrumental in developing wind and solar energy projects nationwide. The 2013 Energy Reform opened opportunities for Spanish energy companies to participate in electricity generation and transmission projects. However, the recent policy shifts under Mexico’s current administration, prioritizing state-owned companies like CFE and PEMEX, have raised concerns about regulatory changes and contract uncertainty among these investors. In this regard, if the new administration is willing to adopt greener policies, this would benefit the Spanish companies in Mexico.
  2. As for banking and financial services, Spanish banks such as BBVA and Santander dominate Mexico’s financial services landscape. In fact, BBVA Mexico is the largest bank in Mexico, controlling a significant market share. These institutions have been critical in financing infrastructure projects and providing financial services to Mexican consumers and businesses.
  3. As for the infrastructure sector, Spanish companies have also actively participated in large-scale infrastructure projects in Mexico. ACS Group, Ferrovial, and FCC have been involved in highway construction, airport development, and other critical projects.

Energy Reform and Trends in the Energy Sector

Mexico’s energy sector has undergone significant transformations in recent years, primarily driven by legal reforms to reshape the industry’s regulatory framework. These reforms, initiated under the 2013 Energy Reform and further influenced by recent administrations, have profoundly impacted domestic and foreign investment in the sector.

The 2013 Energy Reform opened the oil, gas, and electricity markets to private investment for the first time in decades, ending a 75-year monopoly held by state-owned companies Pemex (Petróleos Mexicanos) and CFE (Comisión Federal de Electricidad). This reform encouraged FDI and introduced mechanisms such as production-sharing contracts, joint ventures, and competitive electricity markets. It aimed to boost efficiency, foster competition, and attract cutting-edge technology to enhance exploration, production, and distribution capabilities.

However, the legal landscape shifted significantly under President Lopez Obrador’s administration and will continue to change during President Sheinbaum’s term. The government has pursued an agenda focused on energy sovereignty, rolling back some key aspects of the previous reforms. The most notable proposal, colloquially called the “Energy Counter-Reform,” seeks to strengthen PEMEX and CFE by prioritizing their roles in the energy market and limiting private-sector participation.

On February 26, 2025, the Mexican Senate approved an energy reform that strengthens the dominant role of Pemex and CFE while allowing limited private sector participation. The goal is to achieve energy self-sufficiency in Mexico. The reform passed with 85 votes in favor, 39 against, and one abstention, and will now move to the Chamber of Deputies for final approval.

(i) Pemex’s increased role

Pemex gains more autonomy and preferential conditions to collaborate with private companies in investment projects while maintaining control over them.

(ii) CFE’s market dominance

The CFE must generate at least 54% of Mexico's electricity, prioritizing its supply in the power grid. The system must operate under reliability and continuity principles, promoting a transition to renewable energy.

(iii) State-controlled energy sector

This reform is part of President Sheinbaum’s broader energy policy, aligning secondary laws with constitutional changes made in October 2024. Pemex and CFE will be reclassified as public state-owned companies rather than productive state enterprises, shifting the focus from profitability to social benefit.

(iv) Dissolution of independent regulators

The Energy Regulatory Commission (CRE) and the National Hydrocarbons Commission (CNH) will be eliminated. Their responsibilities will be transferred to the newly created National Energy Commission (CNE), which will be under the direct control of the Ministry of Energy.

(v) Private sector participation

Private companies will still be allowed in power generation but under stricter regulations, ensuring the CFE maintains a majority stake in the sector. Specific models for distributed generation and self-supply will be introduced, with capacity limits and simplified permitting processes.

Other Recent Legal Reforms in Mexico

(i) Judicial

The judicial reform in Mexico has introduced a controversial proposal related to the concept of “voto popular” (popular vote), which aims to increase democratic participation in the judiciary. Under this approach, certain high-level judicial positions, including Supreme Court justices and electoral tribunal judges, would be elected directly by citizens rather than appointed through the current process, which involves nominations by the president and approval by the Senate.

The reform is intended to make the judiciary more accountable to the public and reduce perceived elitism or political bias in judicial appointments. Proponents argue that it democratizes the justice system, giving citizens a direct role in shaping it. In fact, part of the justification for the reform is to grant legitimacy to judges through popular vote. However, critics warn that “voto popular” could politicize the judiciary, undermining its independence and impartiality, as judicial candidates might feel pressured to campaign and make decisions based on public opinion or political interests rather than the rule of law. This aspect of the reform has sparked significant debate, with concerns about its long-term implications for judicial autonomy in Mexico.

Lastly, this judicial reform has already changed the way the “jurisdiction” clause is negotiated in M&A deals and, more generally, in legal contracts. Arbitration or a jurisdiction outside of Mexico will generally prevail as the dispute resolution mechanism for transactions with a nexus to Mexico, primarily due to the legal uncertainty introduced by this reform.

(ii) Labor

Mexico’s labor reform introduced significant changes, including the implementation of independent labor courts and a shift toward collective bargaining. Unlike the United States, employment in Mexico is not “at will,” offering workers greater job security and limiting unjustified dismissals. Employers must also navigate stricter compliance requirements related to outsourcing and workplace equality, reflecting the government’s focus on improving labor standards.

(iii) Tax

Mexico’s tax regime includes corporate income tax at 30% and a value-added tax (VAT) of 16%. Recent measures focus on combating tax evasion and implementing stricter reporting obligations for multinational enterprises under OECD guidelines. Additionally, tax incentives are available for companies investing in priority sectors such as renewable energy and technology, further encouraging economic growth.

Potential U.S. Tariffs

​In February 2025, President Donald Trump announced a 25% tariff on all imports from Mexico, citing concerns over illegal immigration and drug trafficking, particularly fentanyl. These tariffs were initially set to take effect on February 4 but were postponed to March 4 following negotiations with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, who agreed to deploy 10,000 National Guard troops to the northern border and extradite cartel leaders to the U.S. Despite these efforts, the tariffs were implemented on March 4, prompting Mexico to prepare retaliatory measures. Subsequently, the U.S. granted a one-month reprieve for goods compliant with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), delaying tariffs on these products until April 2. This ongoing trade tension has raised concerns about potential economic impacts on both countries, including disruptions to supply chains and increased consumer prices.

Final Remarks and Challenges Ahead

Mexico’s strategic advantages and economic potential make it a compelling destination for foreign investors. However, challenges remain, including regulatory uncertainty, corruption, and security concerns. Investors must stay informed about legal developments and engage local experts to navigate these complexities effectively.

As Mexico continues to adapt to global economic trends and implement structural reforms, opportunities abound for those prepared to embrace its dynamic business environment. The country’s resilience and adaptability ensure its place as a key player in the international investment landscape.

Addressing issues such as infrastructure gaps, environmental sustainability, and workforce development will be crucial for maintaining Mexico’s competitive edge. Businesses can thrive in this vibrant and evolving market with the right strategies and partnerships.

News & Developments
ViewView
Press Releases

Lammoglia Abogados Welcomes Rodrigo Juárez Castañeda to Lead New Antitrust and TMT Practice

Mexico City – Lammoglia Abogados is pleased to announce the addition of Rodrigo Juárez Castañeda as Of Counsel. Rodrigo will lead the newly created Antitrust and Technology, Media and Telecommunications (TMT) practice areas. His arrival marks a significant milestone in our commitment to offering innovative legal solutions in these dynamic fields. Rodrigo Juárez boasts a remarkable track record in both public and private sectors, particularly in telecommunications and economic competition, including having served as head of Monopolistic Practices and Unlawful Concentrations investigations in the Investigative Authority of the Federal Telecommunications Institute (IFT). His strategic vision and leadership have been instrumental in shaping regulatory practices, so we are excited to bring this expertise to our clients. Rodrigo holds an LLB from Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE, 2008) and an LLM from London School of Economics (LSE, 2012). His academic credentials include prestigious institutions such as Barcelona School of Economics and the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. This solid educational foundation, combined with his extensive experience, supports the launch of the Antitrust and TMT practice under his guidance, allowing us to offer bespoke legal strategies that address the unique challenges faced by our clients. In this way, the firm expands its service portfolio to encompass strategic advice and legal representation in economic competition, technology, media, telecommunications, as well as related fields such as intellectual property, privacy, consumer protection and e-commerce. At Lammoglia Abogados, we are dedicated to advancing our clients' interests with cutting-edge legal solutions. Rodrigo's expertise will be invaluable as we expand our service offerings and reinforce our position in antitrust and telecommunications law.
Lammoglia Abogados - July 4 2025
Press Releases

New Partners Announcement 2022

We are pleased to announce the following lawyers as new partners of our firm: HÉCTOR CÁRDENAS ORTEGA Héctor joined the firm in 2010. He has vast experience in mergers and acquisitions, advising buyers (both financial and strategic), sellers and financial advisors in sale processes of businesses and assets in a variety of sectors (food and beverage, educational services, technology, and automotive, entertainment and financial services, among others), including acquisitions through tender offers, leveraged acquisitions and reorganizations, with special emphasis on advising private equity funds in their structuring, as well as in acquisitions and divestments of businesses and assets. As to his real estate experience, Héctor is particularly active in transactions involving the structuring of private equity real estate funds, as well as in the acquisition and sale of real estate properties and developments, working for both investors and developers. Héctor worked as a Foreign Associate at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett in New York, NY (2015-2016). SANTIAGO CARRILLO CATTORI Santiago joined the firm in 2011. He actively participates in complex transactions involving financings, acquisitions and developments across all real estate asset classes, including industrial and hotel assets, representing domestic and foreign financial institutions, private equity firms and developers. He also advises domestic and international lenders in structuring credit facilities for Mexican public and private companies, particularly in structured lending transactions. Santiago worked as a Foreign Associate in the Banking & Finance practice area at Mayer Brown, in Chicago, IL. ADRIANA PADILLA RIVAS Adriana joined the firm in 2015. She has more than 14 years of experience and has participated in several commercial and investment arbitrations, both as counsel and arbitrator, under the rules of several institutions such as ICC, LCIA, AAA-ICDR, ICSID, CANACO, CAM and others. She has extensive experience in dispute resolution in many fields such as M&A, infrastructure, energy, port, construction, retail and corporate, subject either to Mexican, international or foreign law. She also has extensive experience in litigation related to arbitration, including judicial proceedings for the recognition and enforcement of awards and interim measures in arbitration. In addition, she has participated in multiple financial restructurings and insolvency proceedings, advising both companies and creditors, and also acted as counsel to the receiver. Adriana worked as a Foreign Associate in Cleary Gottlieb, in New York, NY (2014-2015). JUAN JOSÉ PAULLADA EGUIRAO Juan José joined the firm in 2017. He has more than 14 years of experience advising multinationals from the energy, real estate, private equity, banking and financial sectors in tax controversy and tax advisory matters. He specializes in representing clients throughout controversy processes before tax and other governmental authorities, regulators and the Taxpayers’ Defense office, to reduce or eliminate contingencies derived from tax audits and other administrative inspections. He has particular experience in advising multinationals on cross-border transactions, confronting complex international tax issues in the application of double taxation treaties. Juan José was a member of Ernst & Young’s international Tax Advisory practice in New York (2014-2016) and Houston (2016-2017).
Ritch, Mueller y Nicolau, S.C. - January 19 2022
Projects, Energy and Infrastructure

Representation of Mexico Infrastructure Partners (EXI)

Represented Mexico Infrastructure Partners (EXI), in the structuring of a new Fibra-E named Fibra EXI, as well as Fibra EXI in the issuance of MXN$22,159 million CBFEs, placed in the Mexican Stock Exchange through an initial public offer and distribution to investors of EXI Funds. Press coverage of the matter can be found here: https://www.bbva.com/es/mx/bbva-mexico-actuo-como-estructurador-e-intermediario-colocador-lider-de-la-fibra-e-de-exi-con-una-oferta-primaria-de-3505-millones-de-pesos/ https://www.elfinanciero.com.mx/opinion/dario-celis/2021/07/30/proximo-lunes-al-mercado-fibra-exi-con-21-mmdp/ https://expansion.mx/mercados/2021/07/30/fexi-fibra-e-bolsa-mexicana
Ritch, Mueller y Nicolau, S.C. - August 13 2021
TMT (Technology, Media & Telecoms)

Reporting obligations of Electronic Payment Fund Institutions (“IFPEs”) and Crowdfunding Institutions (“IFCs”)

The publication of several authorizations in the Federal Official Gazette in recent months allowing various companies to be organized and operate as Electronic Payment Fund Institutions (“IFPEs”) or as Crowdfunding Institutions (“IFCs”) has accelerated the Fintech environment in Mexico. Pursuant to the Law that Regulates the Financial Technology Institutions (the “Fintech Law”) and the authorizations issued thereunder, both IFPEs and IFCs will be subject to the supervision of the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission (the “CNBV”) and the Mexican Central Bank, as applicable, and to the supervision of other competent financial authorities under the terms provided by law. The services consisting of the issuance, management, redemption and transmission of electronic payment funds that IFPEs provide, or services consisting of collective debt financing that the IFCs provide, as well as the operations that such institutions carry out and their organization and operation in general, will be subject, among others, to the Fintech Law, to the general rules and provisions applicable to Financial Technology Institutions issued by the CNBV, to the provisions issued by the Mexican Central Bank in connection with their operations, and to any other rules and provisions in effect and those issued in the future by any competent authority, including those related to transactions with resources of illicit origin and financing of terrorism, which by their nature are applicable (collectively, the “Fintech Regulation”). The Fintech Regulation establishes annual, quarterly and monthly reporting obligations that both IFPEs and IFCs shall comply with, as well as reporting obligations when certain events occur or over certain periods of time. Failure to comply with such reporting obligations could give rise to the imposition of administrative fines. Based on our long trajectory in financial and regulatory matters, we are very active in the Fintech market in Mexico, attentive to the needs of our clients. If you would like to know more about the reporting obligations that are applicable to IFPEs or IFCs, please contact José Berrueta Ochoa ([email protected]) or Rodrigo Carmona Herrán ([email protected]), members of Ritch Mueller´s banking and finance practice.
Ritch, Mueller y Nicolau, S.C. - June 30 2021