Hong Kong

Hugill & Ip, renowned for its comprehensive corporate, family and private client services, is pleased to announce the appointment of Polly Chu as Partner, effective mid-October 2025. Polly Chu’s arrival marks the strategic launch of the firm’s dedicated Real Estate and Conveyancing practice, significantly enhancing Hugill & Ip’s ability to provide seamless, end-to-end legal solutions for both corporate entities and private individuals navigating Hong Kong’s property market. Polly Chu is a highly respected practitioner with over two decades of experience in all aspects of Hong Kong property law. Her expertise spans residential and commercial conveyancing, leasing, property financing (including mortgages and refinancing), and handling complex property-related disputes. Her appointment underscores Hugill & Ip’s commitment to expanding its core service offerings in response to growing client demand for integrated legal support across their most valuable assets. In her new role, Polly will lead the development of the new practice area, focusing on streamlining property transactions, providing robust due diligence for commercial acquisitions, and advising on complex land matters in the context of wealth management and corporate restructuring. Strategic expansion and partner commentary The addition of the Real Estate and Conveyancing practice is a strategic move designed to integrate property expertise directly into the firm’s existing strengths in litigation, private client, and corporate law. Caroline McNally commented on the strategic advantage Polly Chu brings to dispute resolution: "Polly’s expertise is a vital addition. In complex commercial and family disputes, property assets are frequently central. Whether it involves enforcing a contract for sale, managing landlord-tenant litigation, or dealing with adverse possession claims, her ability to provide immediate, precise real estate advice will significantly strengthen our advisory and litigation strategies. This ensures our clients receive seamless, end-to-end solutions, whether they are buying, selling, or fighting to protect their assets. Her presence allows us to manage property-related risks proactively from the outset of any dispute." Alfred Ip highlighted the importance of real estate expertise for private clients and wealth management: "For our private clients, real estate often forms the cornerstone of their wealth and estate planning, whether it’s a family home or an investment portfolio. Polly’s deep knowledge of Hong Kong conveyancing procedures allows us to integrate property structuring flawlessly into our trust and succession planning services. This ensures generational wealth transfer is handled efficiently, securely, and in full compliance with complex land registration requirements. This expansion is essential for holistic private client care, safeguarding our clients' most valuable physical assets." Adam Hugill emphasised the benefit to the firm’s client base: "The launch of the Real Estate practice is a game-changer for many of our clients, who require swift and accurate advice when dealing with property. Whether they are disposing of matrimonial properties, conducting property due diligence for M&A transactions, or managing large-scale corporate relocations, Polly provides the necessary specialist insight. This integration allows us to offer a truly comprehensive service, managing both the corporate structure and the underlying assets with expert precision." About Polly Chu Polly Chu holds extensive experience advising high-net-worth individuals, property developers, and institutional investors on diverse property portfolios. She is known for her meticulous attention to detail and her ability to navigate the complex regulatory environment of Hong Kong’s land and property laws. Polly is dedicated to providing practical, commercially sensible advice that achieves client objectives efficiently.

Hong Kong’s Court of First Instance recognizes the parental rights of same-sex couples, challenging outdated laws and prioritizing equality and children’s rights  A recent judgment from the Hong Kong Court of First Instance has ignited significant discussion, not just within legal circles but across society, regarding the evolving definitions of family and parenthood. This ruling, centered on the legal recognition of a child born to a same-sex couple through assisted reproductive technology, stands as a compelling testament to the dynamic interplay between law, societal norms, and individual rights. It prompts us to reflect on how legal frameworks adapt to modern family structures and the profound implications for equality and human dignity. At the heart of this case is K, a young child born to a female same-sex couple, R and B. Their journey to parenthood involved reciprocal in-vitro fertilisation (RIVF) in South Africa, a process where R, the genetic mother, provided the egg, and B, the gestational mother, carried the pregnancy to term. Despite their marriage in South Africa and their shared commitment to raising K and the declaration by Her Madam Justice Au Yeung that R is a parent in common law, The Hong Kong Government only recognized B as K's legal parent on the birth certificate. R, the biological and social parent, found herself without legal recognition, a situation that led to significant practical and emotional challenges for the family. This legal vacuum prompted K, through R as his next friend, to seek judicial review, challenging the existing legal framework's failure to acknowledge diverse family structures. This challenge comes in the wake of the landmark Sham Tsz Kit case, which established a constitutional requirement for appropriate recognition of same-sex partnerships in Hong Kong, acknowledging their various potential consequences, including breakdown. As Mr. Justice Coleman noted in paragraph 15 of the judgment, while the government emphasized that the South African marriage was not recognized in Hong Kong, their position is at least analogous and comparable to the position of opposite-sex married couples in Hong Kong. The legal battle: Arguments and judicial scrutiny The legal challenge mounted by K centered on the alleged unconstitutionality of key provisions within the Parent and Child Ordinance (PCO) and the Births and Deaths Registration Ordinance (BDRO). The core contention was that these laws, together with the decision by the HK Government not to provide for the registration K in the birth certificate of her own gentically related child, violated fundamental rights enshrined in Hong Kong's Bill of Rights (BOR, Cap. 383) and Basic Law (BL). Specifically, the arguments invoked the right to privacy and family life (BOR 14 & 19), the rights of children (BOR 20), and the right to equality (BOR 22, BL 25). Mr. Justice Coleman's decision and reasoning Mr. Justice Coleman's judgment meticulously dissected the parties' arguments, ultimately siding with K that there is encroachment on or infringement of the BORs engaged and that the constitutional challenge is made good.  Below are a few key findings/reasons from the learned Justice : Rejection of 'Parent at Common Law' Declaration: While acknowledging the previous declaration by Au Yeung J that R was a 'parent at common law', Mr. Justice Coleman found this declaration to be of no practical legal effect. He reasoned that if the PCO explicitly taken out common law rights, then there can be no parent at common law. Unconstitutionality of PCO and BDRO: The court found that the existing provisions of the PCO and BDRO were unconstitutional as they discriminated against children born to same-sex parents and interfered with their privacy and family rights. The judge emphasized that K's identity and well-being were negatively impacted by the lack of legal recognition for R. Rejection of Government's Justifications: The judge systematically dismissed the government's arguments. He found no legitimate aim for the discriminatory treatment and concluded that the measures were disproportionate. He particularly rejected the idea that guardianship orders were a sufficient alternative, stating that they do not confer the same status or rights as legal parenthood. He also dismissed the government's reliance on 'social consensus,' asserting that the will of the majority cannot dictate the court's function in upholding constitutional rights. He emphasized that 'a parent is a parent,' regardless of the circumstances of their child's birth or the parents' sexual orientation. (See Judgment, e.g., paras. 121-168.) A step forward for equality and modern family recognition This judgment marks a significant stride towards a more inclusive and equitable legal landscape in Hong Kong. It underscores several critical points that resonate far beyond the immediate parties involved: Affirmation of Diverse Family Structures: The ruling acknowledges the reality of modern families, moving beyond traditional definitions to embrace the complexities of assisted reproduction and same-sex partnerships. It sends a powerful message that love, commitment, and biological connection, rather than outdated legal constructs, should define parenthood. Child-Centric Approach: At its core, the decision prioritizes the best interests of the child. The court recognized the profound impact of legal non-recognition on a child's identity, well-being, and practical interactions with society. By ensuring that both parents are legally acknowledged, the judgment provides children with stability, security, and a complete sense of their family unit. The Importance of Legal Recognition: The case highlights the critical role of official documents, like birth certificates, in a person's identity and legal standing. It demonstrates that the absence of legal recognition can lead to tangible disadvantages and emotional distress, reinforcing the need for legal frameworks to accurately reflect social realities. Judicial Activism in Protecting Rights: this case stands is a testament to the judiciary's role in safeguarding fundamental rights. This approach ensures that laws evolve with societal values and constitutional guarantees, even in the absence of direct legislative reform. This development in Hong Kong aligns with a global trend towards greater recognition of LGBTQ+ rights and diverse family forms. Jurisdictions worldwide are grappling with similar questions, and many have already moved to grant legal recognition to same-sex parents. This Judgement also prompts further consideration of how other areas of law might need to adapt to fully reflect and protect the rights of all families. The conversation now shifts to how these principles will be implemented and how society will continue to embrace and support all its members, regardless of their family structure. This ruling is not just a legal precedent; it is a societal milestone, urging us to reflect on what truly constitutes a family in the 21st century and how our laws can best serve the interests of every child. The ongoing struggle for equality: A reality check Despite this landmark judicial victory on human rights, the path to full equality for same-sex couples in Hong Kong remains fraught with challenges. This was starkly illustrated by the recent news that legislation to create a separate legal framework for same-sex relationships failed to pass, with many voter rejecting the bill on the basis that it does not accord with traditional value.   This development underscores the persistent difficulty of achieving legislative reform in this area and highlights the crucial role the judiciary plays in protecting fundamental rights when the political process stalls. This is where Mr. Justice Coleman's postscript in his judgment becomes particularly poignant. He wisely noted that when an 'inexorable event' occurs — such as the reality of same-sex couples forming families and having children — society and its legal frameworks must adapt. His words serve as a powerful reminder that while legislative change may be slow, the courts can and must step in to provide for and accommodate the lived realities of all members of society, ensuring that the law does not lag too far behind the inevitable march of social progress. This judgment, therefore, is not just a victory for one family, but a beacon of hope and a call to action for a more inclusive and just future. Author: Raphael Wong

Mourant, a law firm-led professional services firm, has announced 40 mid-year promotions – an increase of over 40 per cent on the previous year. These appointments include 24 promotions in Mourant Governance Services, reflecting significant growth in the firm's entity management and administration business. Five promotions were also awarded to lawyers in the legal practice and 11 in business services. All promotions are effective from 1 August 2025*. This announcement marks another successful round of mid-year promotions, which provide the firm's employees with a second annual window to progress, supporting workplace motivation and satisfaction. Mourant CEO, Jonathan Rigby, said: "I'd like to congratulate my colleagues on their well-deserved promotions. The year-on-year growth in those progressing mid-year is incredibly encouraging. It speaks to the depth of talent at Mourant and our commitment to nurturing and supporting the next generation of leaders." This latest round of promotions follows the 74 appointments in May, an increase of over 30 per cent on the previous year. In addition, two Channel Islands lawyers were promoted to Partner in March this year. Mourant has also recently welcomed a number of significant new hires, including former Kirkland & Ellis Partner, Brad Hillson, who was appointed Global Head of Private Capital in May. Last month, distinguished Guernsey litigator, John Greenfield, and Tom McLaughlin, previously of Dentons New Zealand, also both joined the firm. *Relevant Cayman promotions subject to immigration approval. For further information please contact: Chloe Whittaker, External Communications and Content Manager: [email protected] About Mourant Mourant is a law firm-led, professional services business with over 60 years' experience in the financial services sector. We advise on the laws of the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Guernsey, Jersey and Luxembourg and provide specialist entity management, governance, regulatory and consulting services. We are an international and globally-integrated firm with offices in a number of the world's leading international finance centres, including London and Hong Kong. Our business is intrinsically linked to the global economy and the capital flows that support it. We serve the needs of our clients in all major time zones, facilitating responsible cross-border finance and investment, the pooling and protection of capital and the resolution of disputes. Our clients include many of the world's leading financial institutions, international corporations, asset managers and institutional investors. We are routinely instructed to work alongside the world's pre-eminent legal, accounting and financial services firms. We have an outstanding reputation for integrity and professional ethics, underpinned by a strong risk management culture. Find out more: mourant.com

Johnson Stokes & Master (JSM) is delighted to announce the appointment of Joe Choy as a partner and Co-Head of the Employment & Benefits team. The Firm’s first partner hire since the 160-year-old-partnership reverted to being the pre-eminent independent law firm in Hong Kong, Joe rejoins the practice from Eversheds Sutherland where he led the firm’s Asia Employment, Labour and Pensions team, supporting clients’ needs across the region. Trilingual with extensive experience gained from more than a decade acting as a trusted advisor to clients across a range of industries on all aspects of employment-related matters, Joe is ranked as a leading practitioner in the Lexology Index (formerly Who’s Who Legal) and is recognised as a Rising Star in Legal 500 Asia Pacific. Joe also advises on occupational retirement scheme matters and is regularly involved in employment and retirement scheme issues arising from M&A transactions. As a seasoned litigator, he has conducted employment proceedings at all levels of the Hong Kong courts. Joe is qualified to practise PRC law in the Greater Bay Area (GBA) having passed the GBA Legal Professional Examination for Hong Kong lawyers to practise in the GBA. “Joe’s appointment is significant for our team and the Firm,” said Employment & Benefits Co-Head, Hong Tran. “His practice augments our capabilities as we continue to evolve our offering to ensure that we remain at the forefront in developing sophisticated solutions to the increasingly complex issues our local and international clients face in Hong Kong and Mainland China. It’s fitting that our first partner hire since reverting to being JSM is Joe – he knows our capabilities, clients and culture, so is the perfect addition to our top-tier team.” Commenting on his appointment, Joe said: “Returning to the Firm where I spent the majority of my post-qualification years feels like coming home. The Employment & Benefits team at JSM is regarded as the best in Hong Kong. More broadly, the Firm has outstanding bench strength and genuine full-service capability with an established and prestigious roster of institutional clients.” Senior Partner, Terence Tung said: “Since December, we have promoted seven lawyers to partner and counsel and now announce our first partner hire, who is an alumnus of the Firm. These developments are testament to JSM’s culture, strategy and vision. Being among the international elite of independent law firms around the world, it is important that we hire partners of Joe’s calibre to build upon our market leading capabilities.  We are delighted to welcome Joe back to the Firm.” Consistently receiving top-tier recognition from Chambers & Partners and the Legal 500, the Employment & Benefits team is renowned for its extensive experience advising a diverse portfolio of clients which include leading international and local banks, corporations, conglomerates and government bodies.