Andrew Parkinson > Chambers of David Holland KC and Jenny Wigley KC > London, England > Barrister Profile
Landmark Chambers Offices
Landmark Chambers
180 FLEET STREET
LONDON
EC4A 2HG
England
- Set Profile
- Go to...
Andrew Parkinson
Position
Andrew specialises in planning and environmental law focussing on housing, commercial and energy-related schemes. He frequently appears at Inquiries and has appeared in Court at all levels up to the Supreme Court.
Practice Summary
Andrew is a specialist planning barrister with particular expertise in housing, commercial and energy development. The directories describe him as “a superb advocate, with excellent cross-examination skills” providing “written advice of the highest order” (Chambers and Partners), having “a complete mastery of the details of a case” and being “extremely popular with clients”(Legal 500).
Andrew’s planning practice includes both Inquiry and Court-based work. He has an extensive client-base, including some of the UK’s leading developers and housebuilders, land promotors, landowners, Central Government and a number of local authorities. He is a member of the Attorney General’s “B” Panel of Counsel.
Some of the schemes Andrew has acted on recently include:
- Leverhulme Vision: Seven co-joined appeals for 788 new homes in the Green Belt. Appeared for the developer (with Christopher Boyle KC) at the Inquiry which spanned over seven weeks.
- Chiswell Green: Co-joined Green Belt appeal for 721 new homes, recovered by the Secretary of State. Appeared for the local planning authority at the Inquiry.
- Holborn Studios: Acting for the developer (with Sasha White KC) for this commercial-led development in London.
- Many greenfield planning appeals: Regularly acts and appears at Inquiry for both developers and local planning authorities in edge of settlement planning appeals, particularly in the Green Belt, settlement gaps, and those raising landscape/heritage/highways issues.
- High Street West Regeneration: Advising and appearing for the local planning authority in various challenges relating to this major mixed-use regeneration scheme (including almost 3,000 new homes).
As well as this Inquiry work, Andrew also has a busy Court practice including numerous un-led appearances in the High Court and Court of Appeal. Notably, this has included:
- Compton Parish Council v Guildford Borough Council [2019] EWHC 3242 (Admin) the leading case on “exceptional circumstances” for Green Belt release (for Martin Grant Homes).
- Barton Park Estates v SSHCLG [2022] PTSR 169: Court of Appeal decision clarifying the I’m Your Man principle and the proper approach to determining whether there has been a material change of use (for the Secretary of State).
- R. (Juden) v London Borough of Tower Hamlets [2021] EWHC 1368 (Admin): the leading case on the correct interpretation of NPPF policies protecting veteran trees (for the Claimant).
- R. (on the application of Friends of the Earth Ltd and others) v Heathrow Airport Ltd [2020] UKSC 52: Supreme Court challenge to a third runway at Heathrow Airport (for Friends of the Earth).
- Davison v Elmbridge Borough Council [2019] EWHC 1409 Admin: the leading case on the materiality of quashed planning decisions (for the Claimant).
Memberships
Appointed to the Attorney General’s B Panel of Junior Counsel
Education
Qualifications
- Oxford University, 2007: degree in History (first class)
- 2007-2009: Graduate Diploma in Law (Distinction)
- City University, 2009-2010: Bar Vocational Course
- UCL: LLM in Environmental Law and Policy (Distinction)
Scholarships
- Lincoln’s Inn: Lord Denning; Hardwicke; and Cholmeley Scholarships
Personal
Awards
- Oxford University: Gladstone Memorial Essay Prize; Mary Somerville Prize; and Coombs Exhibition
Lawyer Rankings
London Bar > Planning
(Leading Juniors)Ranked: Tier 2Andrew Parkinson – Landmark Chambers ‘Andrew is a superb planning barrister. Andrew gets to the nub of a case quickly, he is extremely hard working and provides excellent legal advice. Andrew is a highly effective advocate. He prepares meticulously, his presentation of complex matters is outstanding and his cross-examination skills and submissions are second-to-none. Andrew’s efficient and thorough approach is clearly appreciated by public inquiry inspectors and High Court judges, together with his clients.’