Andrew Parkinson > Chambers of David Holland KC and Jenny Wigley KC > London, England > Barrister Profile

Chambers of David Holland KC and Jenny Wigley KC
Landmark Chambers
180 FLEET STREET
LONDON
EC4A 2HG
England

Position

Andrew specialises in planning and environmental law focussing on housing, commercial and energy-related schemes. He frequently appears at Inquiries and has appeared in Court at all levels up to the Supreme Court.

Practice Summary

Andrew is a specialist planning barrister with particular expertise in housing, commercial and energy development. The directories describe him as “a superb advocate, with excellent cross-examination skills” providing “written advice of the highest order” (Chambers and Partners), having “a complete mastery of the details of a case” and being “extremely popular with clients”(Legal 500).

Andrew’s planning practice includes both Inquiry and Court-based work. He has an extensive client-base, including some of the UK’s leading developers and housebuilders, land promotors, landowners, Central Government and a number of local authorities. He is a member of the Attorney General’s “B” Panel of Counsel.

Some of the schemes Andrew has acted on recently include:

  • Leverhulme Vision: Seven co-joined appeals for 788 new homes in the Green Belt. Appeared for the developer (with Christopher Boyle KC) at the Inquiry which spanned over seven weeks.
  • Chiswell Green: Co-joined Green Belt appeal for 721 new homes, recovered by the Secretary of State. Appeared for the local planning authority at the Inquiry.
  • Holborn Studios: Acting for the developer (with Sasha White KC) for this commercial-led development in London.
  • Many greenfield planning appeals: Regularly acts and appears at Inquiry for both developers and local planning authorities in edge of settlement planning appeals, particularly in the Green Belt, settlement gaps, and those raising landscape/heritage/highways issues.
  • High Street West Regeneration: Advising and appearing for the local planning authority in various challenges relating to this major mixed-use regeneration scheme (including almost 3,000 new homes).

As well as this Inquiry work, Andrew also has a busy Court practice including numerous un-led appearances in the High Court and Court of Appeal. Notably, this has included:

  • Compton Parish Council v Guildford Borough Council [2019] EWHC 3242 (Admin) the leading case on “exceptional circumstances” for Green Belt release (for Martin Grant Homes).
  • Barton Park Estates v SSHCLG [2022] PTSR 169: Court of Appeal decision clarifying the I’m Your Man principle and the proper approach to determining whether there has been a material change of use (for the Secretary of State).
  • R. (Juden) v London Borough of Tower Hamlets [2021] EWHC 1368 (Admin): the leading case on the correct interpretation of NPPF policies protecting veteran trees (for the Claimant).
  • R. (on the application of Friends of the Earth Ltd and others) v Heathrow Airport Ltd [2020] UKSC 52: Supreme Court challenge to a third runway at Heathrow Airport (for Friends of the Earth).
  • Davison v Elmbridge Borough Council [2019] EWHC 1409 Admin: the leading case on the materiality of quashed planning decisions (for the Claimant).

Memberships

Appointed to the Attorney General’s B Panel of Junior Counsel

Education

Qualifications

  • Oxford University, 2007: degree in History (first class)
  • 2007-2009: Graduate Diploma in Law (Distinction)
  • City University, 2009-2010: Bar Vocational Course
  • UCL: LLM in Environmental Law and Policy (Distinction)

Scholarships

  • Lincoln’s Inn: Lord Denning; Hardwicke; and Cholmeley Scholarships

Personal

Awards

  • Oxford University: Gladstone Memorial Essay Prize; Mary Somerville Prize; and Coombs Exhibition

Lawyer Rankings

London Bar > Planning

(Leading Juniors)Ranked: Tier 2

Andrew Parkinson  – Landmark Chambers  ‘Andrew is a superb planning barrister. Andrew gets to the nub of a case quickly, he is extremely hard working and provides excellent legal advice. Andrew is a highly effective advocate. He prepares meticulously, his presentation of complex matters is outstanding and his cross-examination skills and submissions are second-to-none. Andrew’s efficient and thorough approach is clearly appreciated by public inquiry inspectors and High Court judges, together with his clients.’