- Latin America
- United Kingdom - Solicitors
- United Kingdom - The Bar
- United States
- What is the GC Powerlist?
- How to nominate in-house counsel
- Africa Teams
- Australia/New Zealand
- Asia Pacific
- Central America
- Ireland Teams
- Latin America
- Middle East
- Middle East Teams
- Nordics Teams
- Russia Teams
- Switzerland Teams
- Turkey Teams
- Client Intelligence Report
- Leadership insight
- Human rights insight
- MINT: the legal challenges of working and investing in emerging economies
- Response to Brexit
- An investigation of the GCC and Middle East legal market
- Litigation and regulatory challenges in financial services
- AI and the law tools of tomorrow:
A special report
- Scottish GCs
- North West clients
- Arbitration backing Africa's investment boom
- Business thinking
- In-house management
- Career path
- Legal perspective
- Big picture
- In discussion
- Interrogating value
- GC interviews
- A tangled web - innovation, IP and patent trolls
- Only connect: Herminia Ibarra on leadership, collaboration and the future organisation
- Pioneering not preservation>
- In-house life: John Harrison, Airbus
GC Diversity & Inclusion Report 2016
- Shaping the future of the Bar Roundtable
- Chief Marketing Officer Roundtable
- Dispute resolution in Africa roundtable
- GC Diversity and Inclusion Report
- Investing in Indonesia: the role of the in-house lawyer in growing markets
- The Legal Business 100 Debate
- GC Powerlist UK summer reception
- The Brexit debate
- AI and the law
- GC Powerlist: Middle East roundtable
- Alternative disputes: the role of arbitration in Turkey
- The risk debate
- Two visions of nearshoring
- Dissenting perspectives
- Developments in Panama
- The international arbitration summit
- The Global 100 debate - Chasing Alpha
- Legal market overview
- Banking, finance and capital markets
- Commercial, corporate and M&A
- Dispute resolution
- Intellectual property
- Real estate and construction
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- British Virgin Islands
- Burkina Faso
- Cape Verde
- Cayman Islands
- Costa Rica
- Czech Republic
- Dominican Republic
- El Salvador
- Equatorial Guinea
- Hong Kong
- Isle of Man
- Ivory Coast
- Latin America: International firms
- New Zealand
- Puerto Rico
- Saudi Arabia
- South Africa
- South Korea
- Sri Lanka
- St Barts
- St Vincent
- United Kingdom
- United Arab Emirates
- United States
Doing business in Ukraine
Contributed by AstapovLawyers
Ukraine is the second largest country in Europe and its position is of strategic importance for the entire continent. Bordered by Belarus, Russia, Romania, Moldova, Hungary, Slovakia and Poland, Ukraine has access to the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov. In addition to having sufficient human, technical and natural resources, Ukraine is at the crossroads of Central European, Central Asian and Middle Eastern traditions. This makes the country an attractive place for trade and foreign investment and has a favourable impact on its business image.
Legal market overview
While Ukraine has a strong agricultural industry, foreign investment in other sectors has been diminished by Russia’s annexation of Crimea and conflict in the self-proclaimed people’s republics in Donetsk and Lugansk.
There is little transactional work in the legal market and few M&A and real estate deals reach completion, although there is widespread optimism that conditions will improve as early as the second half of 2016. Dispute resolution, meanwhile, is an extremely busy area of practice.
The government is moving ahead with its EU association policy, but progress has been slow and many legislative changes are still required. Many prominent lawyers are taking government positions to push forward reforms.
Some international law firms remain in Ukraine, including Baker & McKenzie – CIS, Limited, DLA Piper Ukraine LLC and Dentons. Gide Loyrette Nouel A.A.R.P.I., however, closed its Kiev office, with some lawyers moving to Integritesand the bulk of the group joining France-headquartered Jeantet, which bucked a trend by entering the Kiev market and will be one to watch for next year. Elsewhere, Clifford Chance sold its business to local lawyers now operating as Redcliffe Partners; and Schoenherr also exited the market, moving its Ukraine desk to Austria.
Firms in the spotlight
Onstan Law Firm
Founded in 2013, Onstan Law Firm is a full-service, internationally focused firm in Ukraine. The firm was formed by Yuriy Fedchyshyn, a tax lawyer, Olena Marchuk, a real estate lawyer, Andriy Fedchyshyn, a corporate lawyer and litigator, and Nataliya Khorushko, a banking lawyer and manager who was previously a deputy director of a branch of a large international bank.
Legal Business: country analysis
Breaking new ground – advisers hope shale revolution can restart CEE market
Weighed down by political unrest and slowing economies, energy and infra projects look like one area to be driving
the CEE economy. Can the shale revolution power up
Click here to read the feature.
GC Powerlist -
Search News and Articles
What happened in 2015 in the world of Ukrainian corporate finance was a reflection of larger scale events in and around Ukraine. In this article, we will share our view of the key events in 2015 in the area of cor-porate finance, highlight the most important legislative and regulatory developments in finance and, based on our experience, make a few suggestions for creditors and debtors on how to navigate through 2016.
In the past few years Ukrainian clients have developed an appetite for solving their disputes abroad. Litigation and arbitration sagas involving Ukrainian parties or related to Ukrainian assets often spread across many jurisdictions. In many such sagas various interim reliefs were granted by courts and tribunals.
AstapovLawyers Partner Eugene Blinov & the firm's Associate Roman Protsyshyn share their recent arbitration practice regarding applicable law in contractual disputes.
The 2008 financial crisis peak had hardly faded away, when another breaking news was brought to the surface in CIS countries: a significant part of the funds advanced during the pre-crisis period by banks and other financial institutions to support various businesses and commercial initiatives, flew beyond national frontiers to be found in Panama, BVI, Seychelles, Jersey, Cyprus and other offshore and onshore jurisdictions in the pockets of numerous private persons, mostly CIS nationals. No surprise this fact led to a tsunami of disputes, one way or the other related to repayment of loans and funds advanced under other types of finance arrangements. Many of those disputes are still pending, thus, keeping finance arrangements among the top-litigated issues within CIS borders.
Article V1(b) of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, better known as the New York Convention, provides that recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitral award may be refused, at the request of the party against which it is invoked, only if that party furnishes proof to the competent authority where the recognition and enforcement is sought that it was not given proper notice of the appointment of the arbitrator or of the arbitration proceedings. However simple at first glance, the question of what constitutes 'proper notice' turns out to be less than clear in practice.
6 February has marked lawyers’ calendars with an important message from the UK Supreme Court: English courts will not accept the jurisdiction over a dispute having the “centre of gravity” in another country. AstapovLawyers' Managing Partner Andrey Astapov and Associate Anna Kombikova comment on a recent CIS precedent.
The Presidium of the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (UCCI) recently amended Article 52 of the Rules of the International Commercial Arbitration Court (ICAC) at the UCCI. This article governs the procedure for forwarding an arbitral award to the parties to arbitration proceedings.
Eugene Blinov and Anna Kombikova of AstapovLawyers ILG commented on peculiarities of enforcement of arbitral awards against Ukrainian bankrupt companies. The lawyers noted the risks connected with such cases and suggested possible solutions.
The mitigation of damages is a well-known principle in international legal practice. However, in Ukraine there is no widely applied court and arbitration practice on the issues relating to mitigation of damages, and aggrieved parties may be unclear as to what should and can be done.
The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine at its meeting on August 29 resolved  to amend its Resolution "On approval of the Order for the use of funds allocated in the state budget for payments related to implementation of judgments of foreign jurisdictional authorities rendered upon consideration of matters against Ukraine" (the "Government Resolution"). Appropriate amendments were prepared by the Ministry of Justice (responsible for protecting the state's interests in foreign courts and arbitral tribunals) in order to improve mechanisms to protect the rights and interests of Ukraine in foreign judicial and arbitral proceedings.
AVELLUM leads in the number of the largest public deals аccording to the recently published "TOP 50 Law Firms of Ukraine - 2016" ranking. We have advised on 12 out of 50 largest public transactions, reported by this edition.
Kyiv, November 17th - Eterna Law summed up the results of its social initiative - "P2P" program for law students . This is the first in Ukraine annual scholarship program for law students studying at Ukrainian universities. Two successful winners will be receiving a monthly scholarship and a mentorship support of one of the firm's partners during the academic year. They will also be granted with unique possibility of an internship and employment with the firm. During the selection process more than 350 students of 4th-6th courses of five Ukrainian leading universities – Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Yaroslav Mudriy National Law University, Ivan Franko Lviv National University, Zaporizhzhya National University and National University "Odessa Law Academy"– competed for the right to be the best.Two winners - Viktoriya Polishcuk and Volodymyr Khomenko will start their internship in the firm starting from November 2016.Educational projects are a key focus of corporate social responsibility of the firm. Eterna Law is the only company in Ukraine that cooperates with all key legal faculties in the country. Leading firm’s lawyers regularly carry out master classes and workshops for students.
AVELLUM acted as the Ukrainian legal counsel to AGCO in connection with obtaining a merger control clearance of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine for the acquisition of Cimbria for EUR310 million.
AVELLUM Advises UniCredit on Disposal of Shares in PJSC "Ukrsotsbank" in Favour of ABH Holdings S.A.
Kyiv, 9 September 2016 - AVELLUM advises Custos Invest & Finance Inc., one of the Datagroup’s shareholders, in connection with the increase of the stake of Horizon Capital in Datagroup from significant minority to over 70%.
The dispute resolution team of the Law firm "Jurline" successfully defended the interests of a group of agro-companies (import and distribution of plant protection products, seed, and fertilizers) in litigation dispute with the State Tax Inspection in Kyivskyi district of Odesa.- Jurline
Eterna Law successfully acted for European insurance company Credimundi NVSA member of Credendo grouMoscow, August 30th, - Moscow office of Eterna Law successfully acted for European insurance company Credimundi NVSA member of Credendo group in a dispute. Insurance company Credimundi sued for a large coal company JSC "Southern Kuzbass Coal Company" subrogation on insurance payment in respect of the obligation breached by non-payment of the amount due for the supply of goods.
Kyiv, 5 September 2016 – AVELLUM advised Altran, a global leader in innovation and high‐tech engineering consulting, on the acquisition of Lohika, a software engineering services firm.
Kyiv, 4 August 2016 – AVELLUM advised Allergan Inc. in connection with the divestiture of its global generic pharmaceuticals business to Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd through a complex cross-border carve-out.
Moscow, September 5th – Our client, a major French supplier of hardware and software for the confectionery industry, filed a claim with the International Commercial Arbitration Court (ICAC) against the largest confectionery manufacturer in the Russian market for the recovery of about EUR400,000 outstanding under a supply contract.