Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 APRIL 2025

Seaman's Retaliatory Discharge Claims

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Explore more from Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP

Under American common law, an employer can terminate his at-will employee for good reason, no good reason at all, and even morally wrong reasons.

United StatesTransport

Introduction

Under American common law, an employer can terminate his at-will employee for good reason, no good reason at all, and even morally wrong reasons.1 This rule was not inherited from the English common law. Instead, it originated in this country and is traceable to an American treatise of the late 1800s.2 The same rule was extended to seamen whose employment, in the absence of a contract providing for a definite term or voyage during which a seaman will be employed, could be terminated by either party at will.3 Courts in admiralty, however, began carving out exceptions to this rule. As discussed below, presently, a seaman who is employed at will is protected against retaliatory discharge in violation of maritime public policy as defined by the case law and maritime statutes.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from