Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 APRIL 2015

Courts Consider "Airworthiness" Requirement And "As Is Where Is" Disclaimer

Recently, a District Court in the Western District of Tennessee weighed in on the scope of the term "airworthy" and its sometimes complicated relationship to an "as is where is" clause.

United StatesTransport

Marc L. Antonecchia is a Partner in our New York office.

HIGHLIGHTS:

  • There is a natural discord between an "as is where is" disclaimer and an "airworthiness" requirement in an aircraft purchase agreement.
  • Rules of construction will determine which party bears the risk of loss.

Courts continue to analyze the term "airworthy" and its implications. Recently, a District Court in the Western District of Tennessee weighed in on the scope of the term "airworthy" and its sometimes complicated relationship to an "as is where is" clause. The decision is now on appeal with the Sixth Circuit. (See Holland & Knight alert, "District Court Evaluates Express Warranty of 'Airworthiness,'" Nov. 5, 2014.)

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from