Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 SEPTEMBER 2017

Beware! Reference To Tariff In Bill Of Lading May Not Limit Liability

The standard practice for many motor carriers and railroads is to quote rates for service that are subject to limited liability.

United StatesTransport

Jameson Rice is an Associate in Holland & Knight's Tampa office and William P Byrne is a Partner in Holland & Knight's Jacksonville office.

The standard practice for many motor carriers and railroads is to quote rates for service that are subject to limited liability. The shipper may request full liability coverage from the carrier (for a higher rate), but in practice, shippers often obtain insurance to cover the gap between the carrier's limited liability and the value of the goods being shipped. This standard practice is at odds with the default federal statutory liability scheme for motor carriers and railroads (49 USC § 14706 and 49 USC § 11706, respectively, the "Carmack Amendment"), which imposes upon the carrier liability for the "actual loss or injury," unless the shipper and carrier have limited the carrier's liability. One means of doing so is to enter into a written agreement to limit liability. This clash between the statutory scheme and common

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from