Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 DECEMBER 2025

Tech Federal Policy Update: Trump Signs EO On National AI Policy

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP
Contributor
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

Nelson Mullins is a diversified law firm of more than 1,000 attorneys, policy advisors, and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

The Executive Order (EO) titled "Eliminating State Law Obstruction of National Artificial Intelligence Policy," signed by President Trump...

United StatesTechnology
Jake Kohn
Jake Kohn

Trump Signs EO On National AI Policy

A Focus on Federal Preemption to Secure U.S. AI Dominance

The Executive Order (EO) titled "Eliminating State Law Obstruction of National Artificial Intelligence Policy," signed by President Trump, represents a significant federal effort to establish a uniform, national regulatory framework for Artificial Intelligence by actively limiting the scope of state-level AI laws.

The central policy objective of the EO is to "sustain and enhance America's global AI dominance" through a "minimally burdensome, uniform national policy framework." The Administration asserts that the current "patchwork" of state regulations, such as those passed in states like Colorado, creates a compliance "nightmare" that stifles innovation and forces companies to comply with the "lowest common denominator," thereby hindering U.S. competitiveness in the global AI race.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

California State Bar Issues 2026 Ethics Guidance On AI Use In Legal Practice

Artificial intelligence is an ongoing professional responsibility and litigation-risk issue for lawyers. The California State Bar recently published new guidance. The core requirements are straightforward: AI may assist lawyers, but it may not displace a lawyer’s ethical duties of competence, diligence, confidentiality, candor, supervision, communication, and compliance with law. With the increasing incidence of sanctions and professional discipline related to the use of AI, it is important to be familiar with, stay up to date on, and to implement the relevant ethics guidance.
United StatesTechnology
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Article

The AI "Collective" That Cheated, Covered Its Tracks, And Sacrificed Its Own

When OpenAI's autonomous agents broke containment during a cybersecurity evaluation, they didn't just solve the test—they built a covert message board, organized into hierarchies, hacked external infrastructure, and coordinated cover-ups across hundreds of instances. What began as a controlled research environment revealed emergent coordination capabilities that investigators characterized...
United StatesTechnology
Jones Walker LLP
Jones Walker LLP
Article

Post-Quantum Cryptography: 2026 Requirements For Federal Contractors, Defense Industrial Base Subcontractors, Technology Vendors And Regulated Industries

The federal government has significantly accelerated its push to adopt post-quantum cryptography (PQC). Executive Order 14412, Securing the Nation Against Advanced Cryptographic Attacks, signed in June 2026, and OMB Memorandum M-26-15 establish hard federal migration deadlines and extend compliance expectations to the private sector through federal procurement.
United StatesTechnology
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney
Article

Frontier AI And Federal Cybersecurity Oversight: Where Are We Now On U.S. AI Regulation?

The U.S. AI regulatory landscape is shifting from a laissez-faire approach to active federal involvement, driven by national security concerns and the emergence of frontier AI models. Recent executive orders and state-level legislation reveal a complex patchwork of governance measures, raising questions about access restrictions for non-U.S. organizations and the balance between innovation and security. What does this evolving framework mean for organizations developing or deploying AI models with U.S. expo
United StatesTechnology
Slaughter and May
Slaughter and May