Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MARCH 2025

Review Of EPO Software Decisions In 2024

J A Kemp
J A Kemp
Contributor
J A Kemp

J A Kemp

J A Kemp is one of the largest European patent and trade mark attorney firms, with offices in...

View firm profile
Explore more from J A Kemp

This review is a little shorter than some years, not because the relevant Boards have issued fewer decisions but rather because fewer of the decisions make new or interesting points.

United StatesTechnology

This review is a little shorter than some years, not because the relevant Boards have issued fewer decisions but rather because fewer of the decisions make new or interesting points. The Enlarged Board Decision G1/19 is widely cited and the Comvik approach is universally followed for mixed inventions. However, some interesting decisions, especially in the fields of digital therapeutics and machine learning, are summarised below. In the field of digital therapeutics there are some contrasting decisions that illustrate how a calculation may or may not result in a protectable new measurement. In machine learning, several cases discuss the level of detail necessary in both claims and supporting descriptions.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from