Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 MAY 2021

Disclosing AI Inventions - Part II: Describing And Enabling AI Inventions

In Part I of this series on Disclosing AI Inventions, we discussed the basics of machine learning and the unique disclosure challenges presented by the "black box" nature of trained machine...

United StatesTechnology

In Part I of this series on Disclosing AI Inventions, we discussed the basics of machine learning and the unique disclosure challenges presented by the "black box" nature of trained machine learning models. Nevertheless, current U.S. patent laws are generally viewed as sufficient to ensure adequate disclosure of machine learning inventions to the public, and it will be left to the courts to shape the details of disclosure requirements through interpretation of existing patent laws. In this Part II, we discuss techniques for disclosing machine learning inventions in compliance with the written description and enablement requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112(a).

The test for the sufficiency of the written description is whether the patent disclosure reasonably conveys to those skilled in the art that the inventor had possession of the claimed subject matter as of the filing date.  Enablement requires that the invention be described in such a way that allows one skilled in

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from