Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 APRIL 2026

AI Hallucinations In Court: A Case Study In How Bad It Can Get

Dechert
Dechert
Contributor
Dechert

Dechert

Dechert helps business leaders lead For more than 150 years, we’ve advised the innovators who move...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dechert

Today's guest post is from Dechert‘s Mary Kim. She takes a closer look at a case where plaintiff's use of AI landed them in hot water and how defendants can make the most of these situations.

United StatesTechnology

Today's guest post is from Dechert's Mary Kim. She takes a closer look at a case where plaintiff's use of AI landed them in hot water and how defendants can make the most of these situations. As always our guest posters deserve 100% of the credit (and any blame) for their writings.

********

The existing commentary on the growing epidemic of artificial intelligence ("AI") hallucinations in legal filings has largely focused on the forest—the staggering and accelerating volume of cases, along with the inadequacy of existing sanctions. All of that commentary is correct, and the numbers are genuinely alarming. But sometimes, it is worth stepping back and looking carefully at a single tree.

On March 2, 2026, this blog's modest proposal on the abuse of AI issues mentioned the LeDoux v. Outliers, Inc. case. No. 3:24-CV-05808-TMC, 2026 WL 291023 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 4, 2026). This case is one of those cases that warrants a closer read. Not because it involves a single rogue citation slipping

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from