Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 FEBRUARY 2014

Termination For Breach By "Non-Breaching Party"

Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Duane Morris LLP

On January 15, 2014, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California decided in Powertech Tech. v. Tessera, Inc. that Powertech was not permitted to terminate a license agreement with Tessera for Tessera’s breach because Powertech itself was in breach of the agreement by its failure to pay royalties to Tessera.

United StatesStrategy

On January 15, 2014, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California decided in Powertech Tech. v. Tessera, Inc. that Powertech was not permitted to terminate a license agreement with Tessera for Tessera's breach because Powertech itself was in breach of the agreement by its failure to pay royalties to Tessera.  In reaching this decision, the court pointed to the license agreement's termination for breach provision:

 "Either party may terminate this Agreement due to the other party's breach of this Agreement...however, the non-breaching party may terminate this Agreement if such breach is not cured or sufficiently mitigated (to the non-breaching party's satisfaction) within sixty (60) days of notice thereof" (emphasis added).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from