A case study of Nam Hong Construction & Engineering Pte
Ltd v Kori Construction (S) Pte Ltd [2016] SGCA 42
Overview
In Nam Hong Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd v Kori
Construction (S) Pte Ltd [2016] SGCA 42, the Court of Appeal
(CA) firstly, affirmed the High Court decision that a disjunctive
interpretation of the term "structural steelwork" under s
2(1)(d) of the Building Control Act (BCA) should be adopted.
Secondly, it held that the licensing regime under Part VA BCA does
not apply to subcontractors.
This update takes a closer look at the Court of Appeal's
landmark decision.
Background
Kori Construction (S) Pte Ltd (Kori) was engaged by Sato Kogyo
(Sato Kogyo) to perform construction works for the MRT Downtown
Line Project (the Project). Kori then subcontracted part of the
works to Nam Hong Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd (Nam
Hong). Nam Hong was to carry out "fabrication, loading and
unloading" of steel strutting works including connection
plates