Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 MAY 2024

How To Determine Whether "Common Sense" Could Supply A Missing Limitation? Ask A Reasonable Juror

Axinn LLP
Axinn LLP
Contributor
Axinn LLP

Axinn LLP

Incisive. Inclusive. Invested. We’re Axinn. Experienced, tenacious, and always trial-ready, we are...

View firm profile
Explore more from Axinn LLP

As previously reported, the appeal in Fullview v. Polycom, No. 23-1201, involved the question of whether common sense may be relied upon to supply a missing limitation in an obviousness analysis.

United StatesReal Estate and Construction

As previously reported, the appeal in Fullview v. Polycom, No. 23-1201, involved the question of whether common sense may be relied upon to supply a missing limitation in an obviousness analysis. On Monday, April 29, 2024, the Federal Circuit issued a non-precedential opinion reversing the grant of summary judgment of non-obviousness and affirming the denial of summary judgment of obviousness.

The patent claims at issue are directed to a panoramic viewing apparatus with cameras, a pyramid-shaped element, and a supporting member connecting the two. The parties agreed that the asserted prior art reference disclosed all of the claimed components apart from a contiguous support member "intersecting" the pyramid-shaped element.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from