Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JANUARY 2025

Eminent Domain Valuation Complexities Involving The Project Influence Rule

Nossaman LLP
Nossaman LLP
Contributor
Nossaman LLP

Nossaman LLP

Our clients and our people are what define Nossaman. Our clients provide us with opportunities to...

View firm profile
Explore more from Nossaman LLP

Appraising a property being acquired through eminent domain involves a number of unique valuation rules, including highest and best use, larger parcel, date of value, and unique evidentiary restrictions on comparable sales...

United StatesReal Estate and Construction

Appraising a property being acquired through eminent domain involves a number of unique valuation rules, including highest and best use, larger parcel, date of value, and unique evidentiary restrictions on comparable sales and hypothetical conditions. One of those rules is known as the "project influence rule": an appraiser must disregard any increase or decrease in the property's value due to the project for which the property is being acquired. A recent court of appeal decision, City of Pacifica v. Tong (2024 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 7984*), highlights why this rule is not always easy to apply, and how it can get appraisers in trouble.

Background

City of Pacifica v. Tong involves the City's acquisition of a 1.7-acre property on a bluff overlooking the Pacific Ocean. The property was originally developed with two 20-unit apartment buildings that the owner had previously purchased the property for $6 million. The property had a history of bluff failure and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from