Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 SEPTEMBER 2021

Brenner v. Hermitage

Hermitage denied coverage on several grounds, including that the damage to the premises was due to wear and tear by the tenant's occupancy.

United StatesReal Estate and Construction

Brenner v. Hermitage Ins. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 32667(U), 2018 WL 5261037 (NY Co. Sup. Ct., October 16, 2018)

The Brenner  case involved a first-party property dispute in which the insured landlord made a claim under his policy following vandalism damage to an investment building he rented entirely to a tenant. Hermitage denied coverage on several grounds, including that the damage to the premises was due to wear and tear by the tenant's occupancy.

On April 29, 2016, plaintiff commenced suit against Hermitage alleging that the loss occurred on April 30, 2014.  Thereafter, Hermitage discovered evidence that the loss occurred earlier. Specifically, responses to Freedom of Information Act requests showed that plaintiff had entered into a hold harmless agreement with the Town of Hempstead on April 11, 2014, in which the premises was described as being uninhabitable and damaged as of that date.  In addition, plaintiff had described in a written request for police

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from