On September 20, 2018, in Durham v. Martin, et al., 2018 WL
4496404 (6th Cir. 2018), the Sixth Circuit reversed the Middle
District of Tennessee's finding that Jeremy Durham lacked
standing to pursue a suit against certain Tennessee administrators
that denied him benefits following his expulsion as a legislator
from the Tennessee General Assembly.
The district court had found that Durham lacked standing because
his complaint alleged a denial of benefits caused by his expulsion
from the Tennessee General Assembly, not by any act of the
administrators whom he sued for denying him those benefits. Thus,
the district court seized upon the causation prong of the rule of
standing, which requires a plaintiff to show injury in fact,
causation and redressability. Id. at *1 (citing Steel Co. v.
Citizens for a Better Env't, 523 U.S. 83, 103, (1998)).