Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 SEPTEMBER 2016

The Eighth Circuit Gives Defendants New Ammunition Against Data Breach/Misuse Cases

Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Duane Morris LLP

Since the Supreme Court's decision in Spokeo v. Robins, courts have begun to ratchet back prior decisions on the minimum standard to plead an injury sufficient to establish Article III standing.

United StatesPrivacy

Since the Supreme Court's decision in Spokeo v. Robins, courts have begun to ratchet back prior decisions on the minimum standard to plead an injury sufficient to establish Article III standing. The recent Eighth Circuit opinion in Braitberg v. Charter Communications adds to the growing number of cases defendants will rely upon to get data breach cases dismissed at the pleadings stage. Braitberg addressed standing in the context of the retention, use, and protection of personally identifiable information. Although the case did not involve a data breach, its holding is however instructive when defending against such cases.

In Braitberg, plaintiff alleged that he was required to provide personally identifiable information to purchase cable services and that the cable provider improperly retained his information long after he cancelled the services in violation of the Cable Communications Policy Act ("CCPA").

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from