Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 AUGUST 2025

District Court Rejects CIPA Lawsuit, Setting A Higher Standard For Privacy Plaintiffs

Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Duane Morris LLP

In some positive news for companies facing privacy claims over marketing and tracking technologies, Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. of the Northern District of California has dismissed a putative class action brought under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) against the Gap Inc.

United StatesPrivacy

In some positive news for companies facing privacy claims over marketing and tracking technologies, Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. of the Northern District of California has dismissed a putative class action brought under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) against the Gap Inc. The case, Ramos v. The Gap, Inc., No. 4:23-cv-04715-HSG, challenged Gap's use of Bluecore Inc.'s email marketing technology, which tracks whether a customer opens a marketing email, clicks a link and later interacts with the website. The court's ruling, issued on July 29, 2025, adds to the growing body of federal precedent pushing back on expansive interpretations of Section 631(a) of CIPA in the digital context.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm's full disclaimer.

See more popular content from