Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 OCTOBER 2024

California Privacy Act Sparks Website Tracking Technology Suits

The plaintiffs' bar is leveraging old wiretapping statutes to go after significant statutory damages as state privacy laws expand the definition of "personal information" to include back-end data collected by website...

United StatesPrivacy
  • Womble Bond Dickinson attorneys examine state privacy claims
  • Defendants should look for consent, terms of use, jurisdiction

The plaintiffs' bar is leveraging old wiretapping statutes to go after significant statutory damages as state privacy laws expand the definition of "personal information" to include back-end data collected by website tracking technology.

Whether responding to individual claims or class actions, companies and their legal advisers should take prompt action to map out the best approach based on their unique website, vendor contracts, and technology at issue.

In M.G. v. Therapymatch, a federal judge in California allowed plaintiff's claims under the California Invasion of Privacy Act and California Consumer Privacy Act to proceed against Therapymatch, a clearinghouse for mental-health services doing business as Headway. The company is accused of unlawfully intercepting personal information by using online tracking tools and of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from