Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 OCTOBER 2019

Targeted Social Media Approved By ASA

Global Advertising Lawyers Alliance (GALA)
Explore more from Global Advertising Lawyers Alliance (GALA)

A pattern is now emerging of the ASA rejecting complaints about social media campaigns for restricted products, such as HFSS and alcohol

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

A pattern is now emerging of the ASA rejecting complaints about social media campaigns for restricted products, such as HFSS and alcohol, where the advertiser and the influencer can prove that the activity is not inappropriately targeted at the under 18's.

The latest case concerned Instagram posts by the influencer Tanya Burr promoting Heineken. Six people complained that Tanya Burr was popular with the under 18s and challenged whether the ads had been appropriately targeted.

If Heineken and Tanya Burr had only been able to rely on the self-declared ages of users of Tanya's Instagram account, it is probable that the ASA would not have been convinced that they had proven the negative that is required, i.e. that activity was not inappropriately targeted.  Why? Because the ASA has never accepted that self-declared ages can be relied upon, given the propensity of children to lie about their ages when registering for social media accounts.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from