Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 MAY 2024

Second Circuit Upholds Summary Judgment For Defendants Against Allegations That "All Natural" Label Was Misleading

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

This case has significance for the various "greenwashing" claims currently being pursued in a wide array of state and federal courts across the United States.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Yesterday, the Second Circuit upheld the district court's award of summary judgment in favor of the defendant concerning certain class actions claims that "the phrase 'All Natural' that appeared on the labels of [Defendant's] products is deceptive and misleading." Specifically, the court rejected the plaintiffs' allegations of fraud, as well as consumer protection and false advertising claims, since "plaintiffs had failed to establish how a reasonable consumer would understand the term 'all natural' . . . [and so] plaintiffs could not explain how or why they were materially deceived." Even though the claims here--that the label of "all natural" on Defendant's products was misleading--had survived a motion to dismiss, plaintiffs had failed to introduce sufficient evidence in support of their theories to avoid summary judgment.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from