Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 NOVEMBER 2016

Exhibition Interference Shows That Public Institutions Still Struggle With First Amendment

Two recent interventions by public authorities to remove controversial works of art underscore that, like last year's Leonard Peltier painting dispute, the proper application of the First Amendment remains more elusive than it should.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Use of Confederate Flag in California Painting and Klan Imagery in Massachusetts Leads to Removal of Controversial Works

Two recent interventions by public authorities to remove controversial works of art underscore that, like last year's Leonard Peltier painting dispute, the proper application of the First Amendment remains more elusive than it should.  In California, a state law prohibiting the display of the Confederate flag led to the removal of a specific painting from an exhibition, while north of Boston at Salem State University, a painting depicting figures in Ku Klux Klan robes was shut down entirely.  Together, these examples provide a useful of what state authorities can, and cannot do with regards to messages they find offensive.  The difference is very important.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from