Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 OCTOBER 2021

Will US Discovery Creep Into Private International Arbitration? No Resolution — For Now

Until recently, the U.S. Supreme Court (Supreme Court) was poised to decide a five-circuit split that would affect the way many international companies conduct foreign arbitrations going forward.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Until recently, the U.S. Supreme Court (Supreme Court) was poised to decide a five-circuit split that would affect the way many international companies conduct foreign arbitrations going forward.

As background, section 1782(a) of Title 28 authorizes a district court to order a person within the district to give testimony or produce documents "for use in a proceeding in a foreign or international tribunal."

After unsuccessful negotiations over an indemnity claim made by Rolls-Royce against Servotronics Inc. (Servotronics), the parties entered into a private, binding arbitration in the United Kingdom. Servotronics then filed a motion to subpoena relevant records held by Boeing Company (Boeing) with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, citing the authority bestowed on district courts to assist in foreign discovery proceedings under 28 U.S.C. §1782(a). Rolls-Royce and Boeing filed a motion to quash the subpoena, arguing that §1782(a) does not

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from