Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MAY 2026

Why Your Provider-Directed Subpoenas Aren’t Working

Bracewell LLP
Bracewell LLP
Contributor
Bracewell LLP

Bracewell LLP

Paris is a vital energy hub in Europe, and our Paris office plays a central role in helping address...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bracewell LLP

Texas law requires plaintiffs to prove medical expenses are reasonable and necessary, but post-2018 case law has complicated discovery by making third-party payor information potentially relevant.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Texas law has long required that plaintiffs in tort actions or personal injury cases support their claims for medical expense from a defendant with evidence that the charges were reasonable and necessary. But things shifted after In re N. Cypress Medical Center, 559 S.W.3d 128 (Tex. 2018) and the line of cases that followed, as Texas courts clarified that, under certain limited circumstances, the amounts a third-party medical provider was willing to accept as payment from government/commercial payors could sometimes be relevant to the underlying damages dispute between a plaintiff and alleged tortfeasor.

Since then, third-party subpoenas directed to hospitals, clinics, and other health care providers have become a regular—and increasingly burdensome—feature of Texas litigation. High-volume personal injury lawyers and defense counsel routinely issue boilerplate subpoenas and deposition requests seeking medical and billing information from medical providers. However, these subpoenas

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from