Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JULY 2017

What Can We Infer When Chief Justice Karmeier Asks The First Question In Criminal Cases?

Yesterday, we reviewed the data on Chief Justice Karmeier's questions in civil cases between 2008 and 2016.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Yesterday, we reviewed the data on Chief Justice Karmeier's questions in civil cases between 2008 and 2016.  Today, we take a look at a different side of the data – what can we infer when the Chief Justice asks the first question to either side in criminal cases?

Voting against a party did not make the Chief Justice more likely to ask that party the first question, but writing the majority opinion did have a substantial impact.  When voting in the majority of an affirmance, there was a 17.69% chance that the Chief Justice would ask the first question of appellants, and a 9.52% chance that he would begin the questioning of appellees.  When writing the majority opinion, there was a 30% chance that the Chief Justice would begin with respect to each side.  When not writing an opinion in an affirmance, the Chief Justice asked the first question of appellants 15.87% of the time, and of appellees 6.35% of the time.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from