Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 FEBRUARY 2016

Voluntary Cessation Does Not Moot Case

The school district filed a plea to the jurisdiction based upon lack of standing, arguing that because the district voluntarily discontinued its prohibition of religious signs or messages the case had become moot.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Texas Supreme Court held that the defendant's voluntary cessation of challenged conduct did not render the plaintiff's claims for prospective relief moot where the challenged conduct might reasonably be expected to recur in Matthews v. Kountze I.S.D., 14-0453, 2016 Tex. LEXIS 95 (January 29, 2016).  In that case, middle and high school cheerleaders had a tradition of displaying banners with religious messages at school-sponsored events.  The school district established a policy that no religious signs or messages should be displayed.  The cheerleaders, through their parents, sued the school district.  The school district then passed an order that it was "not required to prohibit messages on school banners . . . that display fleeting expressions of community sentiment solely because the source or origin of such message is religious," but "retained the right to restrict the content of school banners."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from