Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 OCTOBER 2024

U.S. Supreme Court To Review Reverse Discrimination Standard

Akerman LLP
Akerman LLP
Contributor
Akerman LLP

Akerman LLP

Founded in 1920, Akerman is recognized as one of the country’s premier law firms, with more than...

View firm profile
Explore more from Akerman LLP

Should an employee's burden to plead and prove workplace discrimination differ depending upon whether they are considered in a "majority" or "minority" group?

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Should an employee's burden to plead and prove workplace discrimination differ depending upon whether they are considered in a "majority" or "minority" group? The U.S. Supreme Court is now set to decide whether an arguably "heightened" standard of proof should apply in such "reverse discrimination" cases. If the Supreme Court strikes down what has come to be known as the "background circumstances" test, employers in jurisdictions where that analysis is currently applied might expect an increase in claims from members of such majority groups, or an increase in the success of claims brought by such "majority" plaintiffs.

The "Background Circumstances" Test for Reverse Discrimination Cases

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from