Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 FEBRUARY 2024

US Patent Practice: Minimizing The Need For RCE Filings

The typical flow of prosecution before the U.S. Patent Office begins when the U.S. Examiner issues a First Official Action on the merits.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Typical Prosecution Flow

The typical flow of prosecution before the U.S. Patent Office begins when the U.S. Examiner issues a First Official Action on the merits. A response is then submitted to the First Official Action and the U.S. Examiner considers this response. If the application is not allowed, the Examiner issues a Second Official Action, which is almost always a Final Official Action.

Once a final rejection has been issued, the Applicant's options are limited. Substantive amendments are rarely allowed by the Examiner after a final rejection.

Before Filing a Response

The first step is to check to make sure that the rejection has been properly made final. Although not often, sometimes the Examiner makes a rejection final when it should not be final. For example, if the Examiner needs to rely on new prior art in the second rejection, and the need for the new prior art was not caused by amendments made in response to the first rejection, the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from