Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 FEBRUARY 2022

Understanding The Home State Exception To CAFA's Diversity Jurisdiction

Butler Snow LLP
Butler Snow LLP
Contributor
Butler Snow LLP

Butler Snow LLP

Some law firms promise client service. Butler Snow delivers on that promise. Surveys by respected...

View firm profile
Explore more from Butler Snow LLP

The Class Action Fairness Act ("CAFA"), enacted in 2005, expanded federal jurisdiction over class actions. However, CAFA contains some exceptions, or instances when a federal court may not exercise jurisdiction.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Class Action Fairness Act ("CAFA"), enacted in 2005, expanded federal jurisdiction over class actions. However, CAFA contains some exceptions, or instances when a federal court may not exercise jurisdiction. One such exception is the "home state exception," which requires a district court to decline to exercise jurisdiction if two-thirds or more of the members of a proposed class, as well as the "primary defendants," are citizens of the state in which the action is filed.1 It is "designed to draw a delicate balance between making a federal forum available to genuinely national litigation and allowing the state courts to retain cases when the controversy is strongly linked to that state."2 The citizenship of the proposed class as a whole determines whether the exception applies.3

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from