Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 MARCH 2014

Typicality, Adequacy, And The Motion To Deny - Labou v. Cellco Partnership

In Labou v. Cellco Partnership, the named plaintiff sued cell phone company Verizon.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Labou v. Cellco Partnership, No. 2:13-cv-00844-MCE-EFB, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26974 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2014), the named plaintiff sued cell phone company Verizon. She alleged that Verizon had used an automatic dialer to call her cell phone in an attempt to get her former brother-in-law to pay his cell phone bill, a practice that allegedly violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). And she sought to certify a class of everyone else Verizon had contacted with an automatic dialer.

There was a twist: the TCPA does not prohibit collection calls so long as the recipient is not being charged. Verizon did not charge its customers for these auto-dialed calls, so the only people actually harmed were those very few--like Ms. Labou--who were not Verizon customers but were contacted anyway.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from