Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 AUGUST 2022

This Week At The Ninth: Fair Use And Arbitral Summonses

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

This week, the Court considers the fair use defense to copyright infringement and addresses the proper venue for petitions to enforce arbitral summonses.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

This week, the Court considers the fair use defense to copyright infringement and addresses the proper venue for petitions to enforce arbitral summonses.

McGUCKEN v. PUB OCEAN LIMITED

The Court rejects a fair use defense to copyright infringement for the reproduction of photographs in an online article.

The Panel: Judges Ikuta, Nguyen, and Owens, with Judge Nguyen writing the opinion.

Key highlight: "Practically speaking, it is hard to imagine what would not be a fair use, or what could not be readily turned into a fair use, under Pub Ocean's theory. Any copyrighted work, when placed in a compilation that expands its context, would be a fair use. Any song would become a fair use when part of a playlist. Any book a fair use if published in a collection of an author's complete works. It would make little sense to treat this kind of 'recontextualizing' or 'repackaging' of one work into another as transformative."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See more popular content from