Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JUNE 2019

The Uncertain Future Of Gov't Investigations Post-Deutsche

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

This renewed emphasis on individuals was generally regarded as a positive step toward rooting out corporate wrongdoing.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Last month, Chief Judge Colleen McMahon of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued an opinion, U.S. v. Connolly, that could have significant implications for how companies cooperate in government investigations.

Following a trial, defendant Gavin Black was convicted of wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud in the well-known Libor manipulation scheme. Black argued that his conviction should be vacated and the indictment dismissed because interview statements he made to attorneys representing his employer, Deutsche Bank were "fairly attributable to the Government" and "compelled," in violation of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from