Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 FEBRUARY 2022

The Fourth Circuit Raises The Bar For Proving Scienter Under The False Claims Act

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Contributor
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Manatt is a multidisciplinary, integrated national professional services firm known for quality and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

On January 25, 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an important opinion for companies trying to navigate the complex statutory scheme in heavily regulated areas like Medicare and Medicaid.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The author would like to thank Bob Fabrikant, Frank LaPallo, and Sirena Castillo for their contributions to this alert.

On January 25, 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an important opinion for companies trying to navigate the complex statutory scheme in heavily regulated areas like Medicare and Medicaid. In United States ex rel. Sheldon v. Allergan Sales, LLC, the Fourth Circuit held that companies in such industries should not be penalized under the False Claims Act (FCA) for adopting "objectively reasonable" interpretations of complex statutes and regulations when the relevant agency has not issued any "authoritative guidance" to the contrary or discouraged companies from adopting such interpretations. In affirming the dismissal of a qui tam relator's complaint, the court more broadly clarified the standard for proving knowledge (or scienter) under the FCA, which should apply equally to actions brought by either relators or the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from