Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 FEBRUARY 2025

Supreme Court Rules E-Rate Reimbursement Requests Are "Claims" Under The False Claims Act

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

On February 21, 2025, the Supreme Court unanimously held that requests for reimbursement from a privately administered fund qualified as "claims" under the False Claims Act...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On February 21, 2025, the Supreme Court unanimously held that requests for reimbursement from a privately administered fund qualified as "claims" under the False Claims Act (FCA) because the government "provide[d]" a "portion" of the fund's money.1 This alert summarizes the decision in Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Heath and its potential implications for other public-private programs.

Summary of the Opinion

The case involved the Education-Rate (E-Rate) program, which was established under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to subsidize internet and telecommunications services for schools and libraries across the United States.2 Under the program, telecommunications carriers pay into a fund managed by a private not-for-profit corporation, which collects and distributes money pursuant to regulations by the Federal Communications Commission. Those regulations include the "lowest corresponding price" rule, which prohibits carriers from charging

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from