Earlier this month, the United States Supreme Court unanimously
rebuffed the Second Circuit's attempt to expand the scope of
res judicata to include the so-called concept of
"defense preclusion" – a novel doctrine that would
have barred defendants from raising defenses not asserted in
previously adjudicated disputes regardless of whether the
disputes share a common nucleus of operative fact. Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc. v. Marcel Fashions
Group, Inc..
The Second Circuit had set forth a four factor test to bar
defenses where "(i) a previous action involved an adjudication
on the merits"; "(ii) the previous action involved the
same parties"; "(iii) the defense was either asserted or
could have been asserted, in the prior action"; and "(iv)
the district court, in its discretion, concludes that preclusion of
the defense is appropriate." Marcel Fashions Grp., Inc. v. Lucky Brand
Dungarees, Inc., et al.. The elements of this test are
familiar enough, drawing inspiration