On March 5, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against two
veterans challenging the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in a
case that impacts how veterans can appeal disability benefit
denials. The 7-2 decision in Bufkin v.
McDonough and Thornton v.
McDonough affirms that the VA's determinations of
whether evidence is “in approximate balance” are
factual findings subject to clear-error review, rather than legal
questions eligible for de novo review by the U.S. Court of Appeals
for Veterans Claims. This ruling raises the standard veterans must
meet to successfully appeal a denial, reinforcing the VA's
discretion in these cases.
The
Cases: Bufkin and Thornton
Joshua Bufkin, an Air Force veteran (2005-2006), applied for
disability benefits due to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
linked to marital difficulties experienced during his service. His
claim was denied due to conflicting medical evaluations, leading to
his legal challenge.