Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JUNE 2013

Supreme Court Holds That Courts Must Defer To Arbitrator’s Decision To Authorize Class Arbitration

The United States Supreme Court recently held that an arbitrator’s decision to authorize class arbitration will not be disturbed under Section 10(a)(4) of the Federal Arbitration Act when that decision is grounded in the arbitrator’s interpretation of the agreement.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On June 10, 2013, the United States Supreme Court unanimously held in Oxford Health Plans, LLC v. Sutter that an arbitrator's decision to authorize class arbitration will not be disturbed under Section 10(a)(4) of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) when that decision is grounded in the arbitrator's interpretation of the agreement. In so holding, the Supreme Court squared the circle between two recent decisions that demonstrated the Court's predisposition against class arbitration and the Court's traditional promotion of limited judicial review under the FAA.

There are two lessons for practitioners. First, those who seek to avoid class arbitration can best insulate themselves from that risk by incorporating an express class action waiver in any arbitration clause. A standard arbitration clause that is "silent" on the issue of class arbitration will not provide sufficient protection. Given that many arbitration clauses do not expressly address class arbitration, parties

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from