Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JUNE 2009

Supreme Court Docket Report - June 8, 2009

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

If a case does not present a question of federal law, a federal court will in general have jurisdiction over the case only if the parties to the case are “diverse”—i.e., are citizens of different states.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published June 8, 2009

Keywords: jurisdiction, corporation, principal place of business, federal law, federal court, Hertz Corp. v. Friend, American Home Products Corporation v. Ferrari

Today the Supreme Court granted certiorari in one case of interest to the business community:

Jurisdiction—A Corporation's Principal Place of Business

If a case does not present a question of federal law, a federal court will in general have jurisdiction over the case only if the parties to the case are "diverse"—i.e., are citizens of different states.  Federal law provides that "a corporation shall be deemed to be a citizen of any State by which it has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business."  28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1).  Identifying a corporation's "principal place of business" is, accordingly, of central importance in determining whether the parties to a lawsuit are diverse for purposes of federal jurisdiction.  The Supreme

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from