Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JANUARY 2015

Supreme Court Docket Report - January 20, 2015

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Takings Clause—Price-Stabilization Reserve Requirements; Fourteenth Amendment—Right to Recognition of Marriages of Same-Sex Couples under State Law.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On Friday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in two cases of interest to the business community:

  • Takings Clause—Price-Stabilization Reserve Requirements
  • Fourteenth Amendment—Right to Recognition of Marriages of Same-Sex Couples under State Law

Takings Clause—Price-Stabilization Reserve Requirements

In Horne v. Department of Agriculture, 133 S. Ct. 2053 (2013), the Supreme Court held that raisin growers who object to a federal price-stabilization program can challenge the constitutionality of the price-stabilization program as a defense to an enforcement action brought by the government. That program, the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, 7 U.S.C. §§ 601 et seq., requires raisin handlers to surrender a substantial portion of the annual raisin crop to the federal government before they can sell the reminder on the open market. On Friday, the Supreme Court again granted certiorari in Horne, No. 14-275, to decide whether the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from