Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 FEBRUARY 2013

Supreme Court Docket Report - February 19, 2013

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Section 203(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act exempts employers from having to compensate employees for off-the-clock "time spent in changing clothes . . . at the beginning or end of each workday" if a collective-bargaining agreement so provides. 29 U.S.C. § 203(o).

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Keywords: Fair Labor Standards Act, safety gear, Sandifer

Fair Labor Standards Act—"Changing Clothes"

Section 203(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act exempts employers from having to compensate employees for off-the-clock "time spent in changing clothes . . . at the beginning or end of each workday" if a collective-bargaining agreement so provides. 29 U.S.C. § 203(o). Today, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp., No. 12-417, to decide whether donning and doffing safety gear constitutes "changing clothes" within the meaning of section 203(o).

In Sandifer, the plaintiff had brought a collective action under the FLSA on behalf of steel-mill employees, alleging that their employer had improperly failed to compensate them for time spent before and after each shift donning and doffing safety equipment, including fire-retardant jacket and pants, steel-toed boots, goggles, ear plugs, hard hats, a flame-retardant head covering

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from