Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 MARCH 2016

Supreme Court Decision Alert - March 29, 2016

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

First Amendment and Collective Bargaining—Validity of Agency-Shop Arrangements

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Today, the Supreme Court issued one decision, described below, of interest to the business community.

First Amendment and Collective Bargaining—Validity of Agency-Shop Arrangements

Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, No. 14-915

Leaving a hotly contested issue for another day, the Supreme Court announced today that the Justices had divided evenly as to whether the First Amendment permits the mandatory assessment of "agency shop" fees on public-sector employees, to support collective bargaining.  In Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209 (1977), the Supreme Court held that such fees were allowed under the First Amendment.  After expressing doubt about Abood's continuing validity in Harris v. Quinn, 134 S. Ct. 2618 (2014), and Knox v. Serv. Employees Int'l Union, 132 S. Ct. 2277 (2012), the Supreme Court had agreed to decide whether Abood should be overruled.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from