Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JULY 2010

Supreme Court Decision Alert - June 28, 2010

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Under Section 101 of the Patent Act, four categories of inventions may be patented: a "process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter."

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published June 28, 2010

Keywords: appellate, Patent Act, inventions, Bilski, Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, separation-of-powers,

Today the Supreme Court issued two decisions, described below, of interest to the business community.

  • Patent Law—Patentable Subject Matter
  • Sarbanes-Oxley Act—Separation of Powers—Constitutionality of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Patent Law—Patentable Subject Matter

Bilski v. Kappos, No. 08-964 (previously discussed in the June 1, 2009 Docket Report).

Under Section 101 of the Patent Act, four categories of inventions may be patented: a "process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter." 35 U.S.C. § 101. In a decision with profound importance to the patent system, the Supreme Court held today in Bilski v. Kappos, No. 08-964, that a method for hedging against the risk of price changes in the energy market is not a patentable "process." 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from